Nobel laureate Amartya Sen may have given the UPA a shot in the arm by slamming the opposition for disrupting Parliament and blocking passage of the food security bill,but the Left too has lapped up his remarks to hit out at the government. In an article in the CPMs Peoples Democracy,leftist economist Prabhat Patnaik notes that his argument that several hundred children would go hungry or die from under-nutrition if the bill is not passed only underscores the problem of hunger and under-nutrition in the country,contrary to claims made by successive governments that poverty is on the decline.
An expose of this seriousness coming from a person of Sens eminence is of great significance,for this is precisely what the Left has been saying all along and what the government,whether NDA or UPA,has been denying all along. Successive governments have claimed that poverty has been declining in India. The World Bank too has claimed that Indias poverty ratio has been declining, Patnaik notes. To say that poverty has come down while hunger has increased,he says,will mean that either the price index used is wrong or that people,even though they have adequate real purchasing power,choose voluntarily not to spend as much on food as they should have.
The CPIs mouthpiece New Age talks about the Karnataka verdict. The electorate,it says,had no option but to chose the bad over the worse. Interestingly,while noting the JD(S) had an impressive performance,it says the party ruined its chances by adopting a confused approach: Former chief minister Kumarswamy… in place of projecting alternative sets of policies to fight communalism,corruption and crony capitalism of both the BJP and Congress,continued to dream of emerging as a king maker… Another mistake committed by the JD(S) leadership was adopting all deserters from both the Congress and BJP and awarding them tickets, it says. The article argues that the significance of the victories of non-Congress and non-BJP forces should not be minimised.
The editorial in the CPI(ML)s ML Update hits out at the UPA over allegations of corruption. It talks about the coal scam,the editing of the CBIs status report,the Supreme Courts caged parrot remark and the railway scandal. Referring to the sacking of Ashwani Kumar,it asks why should not Manmohan Singh lose his job as Prime Minister,since the PMO too was equally implicated in the same offence of influencing the CBI report?
With one tainted minister after another being exposed and forced to make an ignominious exit,the game is up for Team Manmohan. The captain must now quit and let the people express their mandate, it says. The article argues the BJP was no better and notes that it paid the price in Karnataka,where it presided over the worst corporate plunder and loot of land and minerals.
Compiled by Manoj C.G.