Rotting food,rotten arguments

How do food bill supporters ignore the 45 per cent leakage in PDS,especially after their own studies?

Written by Surjit S Bhalla | Published: September 4, 2013 12:16:30 am

How do food bill supporters ignore the 45 per cent leakage in PDS,especially after their own studies?

Everything populist (popular) is wrong — Oscar Wilde modified (ever so slightly)

There have been some questions raised about my estimate of the food security bill (FSB) costing Rs 3,14,000 crore or approximately 3 per cent of the GDP (‘Manmonia’s FSB: 3% of GDP’,IE,July 6). In their article ‘Correct costs of the food security bill’ (FE,August 17),three distinguished economists (Ashok Kotwal,Milind Murugkar,Bharat Ramaswami,hereafter KMR) join together to demonstrate that I was barking up the wrong tree,that my calculations were all wrong and that the true cost of the FSB would only be 18 per cent higher at Rs 85,000 crore (full disclosure: I insisted that their article be published).

The KMR estimates have been boldly endorsed in a spate of recent articles and/ or comments,for example,by Planning Commission member Abhijit Sen,in articles in Tehelka and Mint,and in cyberspace by leading economist Debraj Ray. These are senior and respected economists/ commentators,and it is important that their (wild) allegations be seriously looked into.

In my article,I had provided a simplified short-cut method of estimating the approximate size of the food subsidy. In the table,I present stage-by-stage estimates of the FSB, from procurement to distribution. Broadly speaking,there are four estimates of the cost of the FSB. The lowest of these is the one by KMR: at Rs 85,000 crore,they are some Rs 40,000 crore less than even the official estimate of Rs 125,000 crore.

This is the first time I have witnessed any person,let alone respected economists,estimate leaky government subsidies to be less than even the leaky government of the day has claimed,and not just in India but anywhere in the world. And not leaky by a small amount — by 47 per cent (Rs 125,000 crore versus Rs 85,000 crore)! I would appreciate if any reader can provide evidence to the contrary.

The third estimate — Rs 2,27,000 crore — is by a government food official and expert,Ashok Gulati and his team (hereafter Gulati). Gulati is the chairman of the Commission on Agricultural Costs and Prices,and therefore in a natural position to know better.

The FSB provides a right to 860 million people (bottom 67 per cent in rural areas and bottom 50 per cent in urban areas) to avail 60 kilograms of rice and wheat a year for Rs 2.50 per kg,and a subsidy on each kilogram of Rs 20.30. This leads to a total distribution of 51.5 million metric tonnes (MMT) a year at a cost of Rs 1,05,000 crore. In addition,the government has added recipients who will receive extra cash or grain (for example,pregnant women,special groups) and Gulati estimates this subsidy to be Rs 23,000 crore The total,at Rs 1,28,000 crore,is almost identical to the government estimate of Rs 1,25,000 crore. But far,far removed from the left-touted estimate of Rs 85,000 crore.

Gulati has additional costs (agricultural production enhancement costs,infrastructure and logistics,etc) that add up to Rs 54,000 crore. So the base Gulati estimate is Rs 1,82,000 crore.

How does a respected authority like Gulati get a higher estimate of Rs 2,28,000 crore? The above Rs 1,82,000 crore estimate assumes that there are no storage costs,no rotting food and no leakages in distribution. It is as if the government was playing god with efficiency. In their reign since 2004-05,the UPA buffer stocks have averaged 37 MMT,which,at a cost of Rs 20.30 per kg,comes to approximately Rs 75,000 crore,or Rs 2,000 crore per tonne. Gulati says that no more than 20 MMT are needed,and thus the storage costs will be Rs 40,000 crore a year. The Gulati final estimate,therefore,is Rs 2,22,000 crore. However,if the average historical storage of the UPA is taken (why would they do things differently in the 10th-plus years if for nine years they have felt it necessary to store annually 37 MMT?),then the basic costs rise by an additional Rs 34,000 crore.

But even the Gulati estimate assumes that the government is perfect,there is no rotting grain,and there are no leakages from the FCI to the ration shop (Leakage 1),and no leakages by providing grains to people not eligible (Leakage 2). The government’s own estimate of food that goes rot in the night (or leaks to the liquor trade?) is Rs 30,000 crore. Which brings a conservative estimate,with no leakages at all,of the FSB costing Rs 2,86,000 crore,more than three times the low-ball,rogue,KMR estimate of Rs 85,000 crore.

The leakages are yet to be accounted for. Do we have any estimate of these? Yes,we have an expert on the subject who is none other than the R in KMR,Bharat Ramaswami. In an exhaustive analysis on the Indian PDS system for 2004-05,Ramaswami estimated that only 10 per cent of the PDS money reached the targeted population — rest,all leakage! Curiously,in his new avatar,Ramaswami believes that all leakages have disappeared into thin air,the UPA government came and reached nirvana for the poor,and for him,and these leakages are now zero!

Leakage 1: This occurs before the food even gets to the ration shop. This leakage has been estimated by various authors,for various years,to be approximately 45 per cent of the food that leaves the FCI but does not reach either the poor or the rich. Given the official distribution of around 56 MMT,this leakage is 25 MMT,or around Rs 50,000 crore.

Leakage 2: Analysis of those not eligible for food subsidies in 2013-14 (those above the 67th percentile in rural areas and the 50th percentile in urban areas) with 2011-12 NSS data indicates that there were 143 million non-eligible individuals who received an average of 4.5 kg of grain per month. Leakage 2: Rs 17,500 crore.

Summing up,the Gulati estimate with no rotten food and no leakages was Rs 2,56,000 crore. Add the following — extra storage: Rs 34,000; rotten food: Rs 30,000; Leakage 1: Rs 50,000; Leakage 2: Rs 17,500. These four items add up to Rs 1,31,500 crore. Maybe all these extra costs will be zero,and as the pigs fly,we will observe the minimum estimate of Rs 2,56,000 crore to be right. Maybe the new government will increase efficiency,decrease corruption,and reduce these extra costs by half — a 100 per cent improvement! In which case,the FSB,if implemented according to both the spirit and the letter of the law,will be Rs 3,20,000 crore,somewhat higher than my original estimate of Rs 3,14,000 crore.

What all this means is the following. First,unfortunately,ideology goes a long way in explaining policy dialogue in India. Second,I am thankful to KRM for pushing me via their provocatively wrong estimates to set the record straight. I would suggest to KRM that they influence the respected (albeit ideological!) Economic and Political Weekly to publish further discourse on the subject (I would be happy to contribute),so the subject can be dealt with the finality and truth that it deserves.

The writer is chairman of Oxus Investments,an emerging market advisory firm,and a senior advisor to Zyfin,a leading financial information company.

For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App

More From Surjit S Bhalla
  • Pro-women, pro-poor

    India may have just witnessed the best four years of inclusive growth, thanks to the Centre’s sanitation programme..

  • Not a question of cash

    Whether demonetisation failed or succeeded is not a moral question. Is it too much to expect that in this data-dependent world, we should discuss hard…

  • No Proof Required: GDP Report – misreading the facts

    Back-series GDP Report mistakenly concludes that GDP growth during UPA-I was higher by 0.5 per cent per annum. GDP growth was very likely lower by…