scorecardresearch
Follow Us:
Friday, August 06, 2021

Over the Barrel: Green fig leaf

Finance minister’s focus on growth and equity is incomplete. He should have acknowledged the trade-off between the need for energy and the imperative of environmental protection.

Written by Vikram S Mehta |
Updated: March 2, 2015 12:16:03 am
arun jaitley, finance comission, ffc Finance Minister Arun Jaitley arrives in Parliament to present the annual budget 2015-16 in New Delhi on Saturday.

The budget is sensible, pragmatic, inclusive and, in some respects, innovative and growth-oriented. The finance minister has addressed almost all of the issues that have exercised society over the last few months. And he has done so without flourish, populism or, indeed, a big-bang announcement. That said, there is a caveat. I was disappointed that the FM did not dedicate at least a few sentences to the importance of weakening the linkage between economic growth, energy demand and the environment.

Consider the following situation. The minister of power succeeds in achieving his objective of doubling coal production from the current 500 million tonnes to 1 billion tonnes by the end of this decade (in a post-budget TV interview, he spoke of trebling production); the current rate of migration from villages to cities continues unabated and the urban population increases from 300 million today to 600 million in 2020. The bulk of this population is young, with a median age of 25. They want to trade up from a cycle to a motorised vehicle. Two-wheeler and automobile manufacturers capitalise

on this aspirational demand and record increasing sales and profitability. With no substantive substitute, this leads to a surging demand for petrol and diesel.

(Illustration by: C R Sasikumar) (Illustration by: C R Sasikumar)

Now consider the consequences of this situation. Urban India gets dangerously exposed to the cancerous fine particulates emitted by vehicular traffic. Already they are suffering. The number of deaths from respiratory illness and asthma in India is the highest in the world. According to Michael Greenstone of the University of Chicago, the life expectancy of the 600 million people in urban India will reduce by 3.2 years. Further, much of our forest cover gets denuded. This is because a large proportion of our coal reserves is in richly forested areas and this will be cleared to achieve the minister’s ambitious target. Finally, India emerges as the second-largest emitter of greenhouse gases in the world. Coal is the dirtiest of all fossil fuels and a large number of thermal power plants run on outdated and inefficient technology. The government’s seeming lack of commitment to move on to a low-carbon trajectory growth path undermines its standing in multilateral discussions on arresting global warming and climate change.

The FM spelt out his vision in clear and measured language. It was focused on securing economic growth, distributive equity and social justice. It would have sounded more complete had he acknowledged the conflictual trade-off between the need for energy and the imperative of environmental protection, and sought to address this conflict within the larger frame of his vision. He did have a slew of proposals, but they were presented in a somewhat disconnected manner. Thus, the decision to double the cess on coal from Rs 100 per tonne to Rs 200 per tonne to fund the “clean energy fund” made no mention of R&D and innovation in clean energy. Perhaps this was deemed self-explanatory, but given that in the past, the money in this fund has not been used for this purpose, the FM would have done well to make explicit the connection. In the same vein, he mentioned a carbon tax but did not clarify how and where he intended to apply it. He reiterated the government’s intent to substantially increase the generation of electricity from solar and wind, but without providing a roadmap for its practical implementation.

Over and above these matters of presentation, the green energy agenda fell short on four issues of substance. One, the FM made no mention of natural gas. This, despite the fact that gas is the cleanest of all fossil fuels — gas-based power plants emit 50 per cent less carbon dioxide than coal-based units — and that 20 gigawatt of generation capacity has not been operationalised because of inadequate gas supplies and poor pipeline infrastructure. The FM should have acknowledged the significance of gas and announced that investment in pipelines would receive the same tax benefits as other major infrastructural investment.

Two, the FM did not elaborate on the support that the solar and wind energy sector would require to increase solar energy capacity from the current 2.5 GW to over 100 GW by 2020, and wind energy from 22.5 GW to 50 GW by 2030. This should have been done to respond to the critics who believe this is an unattainable target. These critics have a point. To achieve this goal, the government will have to add an incremental 19 GW of solar and 6 GW of wind annually. Hitherto they have logged an average increment of 1-1.5 GW annually. In the absence of a fuller explanation on the roadmap for execution, this announcement can be justifiably seen as no more than a populist flourish.

Three, the FM allocated only Rs 75 crore for invigorating the electric vehicle (EV) market. EVs (cars and cycles) are the answer to sustainable mobility. They have not taken off in India because of high upfront costs, delays in the disbursement of subsidies and the erraticism of power supply. But the costs are coming down; battery storage capacity has been enhanced by technological developments; Indian companies are interested and the inter-ministerial turf battles that have in the past delayed subsidy disbursement have been reduced. The FM should have leveraged these positives to give EVs a stronger fillip, rather than hold out what, at first glance, looks like a fig leaf.

Finally, perhaps most significant is the FM’s sanction of five ultra mega thermal plants. Other than the passing reference to a carbon tax, his speech contained nothing to ameliorate the concerns of environmentalists.

Perhaps the fineprint will show that my concerns are exaggerated and that the FM is indeed cognisant of the longer-term ramifications of neglecting the environmental implications of an energy system grounded on fossil fuels. Certainly, the prime minister has expressed his concern by calling for the “saffron revolution”. If so, I will retract my comments. If not, I hope these issues will be brought front and square into the debate.

The writer is senior fellow, Brookings Institution and executive chairman, Brookings India.

📣 The Indian Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@indianexpress) and stay updated with the latest headlines

For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App.

  • The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
0 Comment(s) *
* The moderation of comments is automated and not cleared manually by indianexpress.com.
Advertisement

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement