Follow Us:
Sunday, August 07, 2022

Next Door Nepal: Will Nepal make up its mind?

Neighbours’ competitive help for reconstruction will mean little otherwise

Updated: May 11, 2015 12:00:26 am
nepal earthquake, india nepal earthquake relief, india relief, nepal earthquake bengal relief, chandra kumar ghimire, chandra kumar ghimire interview, interview, indian express interview, kolkata news, nepal news In the shattered neighborhoods of Kathmandu, down buckled, potholed dirt roads, similar stories emerge. (Source: Reuters)

By Yubaraj Ghimire

Search and rescue teams from 34 countries, apart from internal security agencies, are slowly leaving a Nepal that is still mourning the loss of life and property caused by the April 25 earthquake. How the government will mobilise much-needed support for providing relief and shelter is something eight million victims have no clue about. Official figures so far indicate that around 8,000 people lost their lives, with more than 14,000 wounded and nearly 6,00,000 houses damaged.

The absence of coordination has hit relief work, especially in remote corners of the 14 worst-hit districts. Despite helping hands extended by many external donors and NGOs, complaints continue that the three key parties — the Nepali Congress, the Communist Party of Nepal-Unified Marxist Leninist (CPN-UML) and the Unified Communist Party of Nepal-Maoist (UCPN-M) — are influencing the distribution of relief, injecting partisan politics into a humanitarian tragedy. Donors, including the UN and the US, have asked the government to be less bureaucratic in lifting aid-material from customs and allowing them to work with their partners, instead of the government and its agencies.

The appeal comes in the wake of the government’s decision that any money raised or donated must be deposited with the prime minister’s relief fund. The PM’s concern is understandable, but the past experience of the use, misuse and abuse of government coffers by the major parties, without accountability, has made the people and external donors sceptical of a single-door approach. In many affected districts, villagers living in tents have asked that the army — and not political parties — be involved in relief distribution.

Subscriber Only Stories
No victim-blaming, no fetishising of abuse: Darlings shows why we need mo...Premium
How the Indian action spectacular RRR became a smash in AmericaPremium
5 ways in which Samsung could improve the Galaxy Z Flip 4 and Fold 4Premium
Explained: First flight of India’s newest rocket, what it means for...Premium

The government’s poor response in the first 10 days further eroded public faith. Neither PM Sushil Koirala nor his Nepali Congress, nor even coalition partner UML, to say nothing of the opposition Maoists, called meetings of their respective party’s central committees to assess the impact of the disaster. Parliament was called only on the 12th day, since a regular session was due. Only once in the first 12 days did three top leaders — Koirala, UML chief K.P. Oli and Maoist chief Prachanda — travel on a helicopter together to convey the message that they were working together to meet the challenge.

From the international community, Indian PM Narendra Modi was the first to dispatch rescue teams. He has promised all help for the reconstruction, including the demolished heritage site. The Chinese have officially conveyed that they would be willing to work with India on reconstruction. In fact, there is an enviable degree of cooperation on offer from competing countries like Nepal’s two neighbours, which has been motivating many others. But all of that will mean nothing without the host government being clear about what it wants its neighbours and others to do.

The only mega scheme that the central bank has announced so far is interest-free loans for houses. But what will the government do with those who have nothing to “mortgage” for the loan? Indeed, top leaders of the three parties are still debating how much the government would need for reconstruction. The three parties also want a monopoly over monitoring and executing post-earthquake expenditure.

The effective handling of the post-earthquake situation in 1934 by Juddha Shumsher, then PM and head of the reigning oligarchy, is being cited in the media as a role model. In 1989, the then king, Birendra, personally supervised the relief and rescue work and camped with the victims. The current government’s lack of clarity may invite an angry response from the people.

TWO IS ALWAYS BETTER | Our two-year subscription package offers you more at less

📣 Join our Telegram channel (The Indian Express) for the latest news and updates

For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App.

  • Newsguard
  • The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
  • Newsguard
First published on: 11-05-2015 at 12:00:23 am
0 Comment(s) *
* The moderation of comments is automated and not cleared manually by

Featured Stories