Political writers can either exercise influence by aligning with a team or by taking a view that comes from distance
Lets say you are a young person beginning to write about politics and policy. You probably have some idea of what you believe,but have you thought about how you believe it? That is to say,have you thought about where you will sit on the continuum that stretches from writers who are engaged to those who are detached?
Writers who are at the classic engaged position believe that social change is usually initiated by political parties. To have the most influence,the engaged writer wants to channel his efforts through a party. The engaged writer closely and intimately aligns with a team. In his writing,he provides arguments for the party faithful and builds community by reminding everyone of the errors and villainy of the opposing side. For the engaged writer,the writing is often not about persuasion. (Realistically,how many times does a piece of writing persuade someone to switch sides?) Its often about mobilisation. Its about energising the people who already agree with you.
The engaged writer often criticises his own party,but from a zone of trust inside it,and he is usually advising the party to return to its core creed. The engaged writer is willing to be repetitive because thats how you make yourself an unavoidable pole in the debate. The goal is to have immediate political influence,to provide party leaders with advice,strategy and policy recommendations.
The detached writer also starts with a worldview. If you dont have a philosophic worldview,your essays wont even rise to the status of being wrong. They wont be anything. But the detached writer wants to be a few steps away from the partisans. She is progressive but not Democratic,conservative but not Republican. She fears the team mentality will blinker her views. She wants to remain mentally independent because she sees politics as a competition between partial truths,and she wants the liberty to find the proper balance between them,issue by issue.
The detached writer believes that writing is more like teaching than activism. Her essays are generally not about winning short-term influence. (Realistically,how many times can an outside writer shape the short-term strategies of the insider politicians?) She would rather have an impact upstream,shaping peoples perceptions of underlying reality and hoping that she can provide a context in which other people can think. She sometimes gets passionate about her views,but she distrusts her passions. She takes notes with emotion,but aims to write with a regulated sobriety.
There are trade-offs,no matter what spot on the continuum you ultimately choose. The engaged writer enjoys a tight community and a powerful sense of commitment. The detached writer enjoys more freedom and objectivity. The engaged writer emphasises loyalty,while the detached writer emphasises honesty. At his worst,the engaged writer slips into rabid extremism and simple-minded brutalism. At her worst,the detached writer slips into a sanguine,pox-on-all-your-houses complacency and an unearned sense of superiority. The engaged writer might become predictable. The detached writer might become irrelevant,ignored at both ends.
These days most writers land on the engaged side of the continuum. Look at most think tanks. They used to look like detached quasi-universities; now some are more like rapid response teams for their partisan masters. If you ever want to get a political appointment,you have to be engaged,working on political campaigns and serving the team.
But I would still urge you to slide over toward the detached side of the scale. First,there is the matter of mental hygiene. You may think you can become a political partisan without becoming rigid and stale,and we all know people who achieve this,but the risk is high.
Engaged writers gravitate toward topics where they can do the most damage to the other side. These are topics where the battle lines are clearly drawn,not topics where there is a great deal of uncertainty. Engaged writers develop a talent for muzzle velocity,not curiosity. Just as in life,our manners end up dictating our morals. So,in writing our prose,styles end up shaping our mentalities. If you write in a way that suggests combative certitude,you may gradually smother the inner chaos that will be the source of lifelong freshness and creativity.
Also,detached writers have more realistic goals. Detached writers generally understand that they are not going to succeed in telling people what to think. It is enough to prod people to think to provide an idea or piece information that sets readers on a train of thought that takes them far in front of whatever you put down. The detached writer understands that,at the top level,politics is a bipolar struggle for turf. But the real fun is down below,sparking conversations about underlying concepts,underlying reality and the underlying frame of debate.