Decision on how long to play on must never belong to the playerhttps://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/decision-on-how-long-to-play-on-must-never-belong-to-the-player/

Decision on how long to play on must never belong to the player

With the future of four or five of the very best to be decided,India,more than ever,need selectors of substance

With the future of four or five of the very best to be decided,India,more than ever,need selectors of substance

It is only the brave and the content who know when to go. It is a difficult combination to possess and it is a rare person who has it. Some years ago,my father wrote of my father-in-law that by opting not to prolong a life in the intensive care unit,he had vanquished death at its own game. Giving up a sport might seem trivial compared to a life but for those who play it,and know little else of the world,saying good-bye to the spotlight is an almost impossibly difficult task.

Unless of course you are bored,tired,frustrated or have a lucrative television contract that you have to take a decision on within a week. Ian Chappell said he looked at the clock at 11.10,Ian Healy said going to training became a burden,Anil Kumble had taken every pain-killer around,Kapil Dev had the record he so wanted and deserved. But for most,playing sport has been a way of life for twenty years,it has been their identity,their badge of honour,their cloak of accomplishment. It has defined them but often it has blinded them to the existence of another world,one that they must now enter and are unready for — why even one they might have looked down at in the company of colleagues.

“Am I going to buy my own tickets,” they might ask,“stand in a queue to check-in,hope the sponsor I gave a hard time to now remembers me? Damn,I’ll play another season.”

Advertising

In the days gone by it was a bit easier. You gave up a little bit of fame but opted for a longer career whilst you still could. You got an opening in insurance,or became a school teacher,or,for those more blessed,you entered the lucrative family business. You knew cricket didn’t always pay for the mortgage or ensure an easy life after. Now,staying on in the game has a far greater financial value attached; you,or your old classmate who became a chartered accountant,can calculate the future value of being in the team for another year.

It is a real issue,not one to be scoffed at or ridiculed. If we were cricketers at 35 having to take a call on whether or not to end a career,we would think similarly. There is enough money in the bank but becoming a ghost-written columnist doesn’t quite have the same ring to it as walking out to bat in a full stadium.

And that is why the decision on how long to play on must never belong to the player. I often hear people saying that a Tendulkar or a Warne or a Kallis or a Ponting have earned the right to decide when to go. Of course they haven’t. Nobody has. Team sport at the very highest level is about putting the best people on the park,or those that you know can still be the best,for going through a difficult phase is written in the destiny of every athlete. The decision on whether or not a player is still capable of playing at his best must belong to someone else — to a selector whose job,whose Hippocratic Oath,is to pick the best possible side for the national team.

And that is why picking the right selectors,proud,independent men who command respect for their integrity,is the key function of those that administer our game. It is a job that requires firmness and sensitivity; firmness in taking a decision and sensitivity in communicating it. It is a specialised skill not a handout to someone who has the time.

It is imperative too that the selectors are independent and not pressured by others who might have reasons independent of team requirements. Many years ago in Hyderabad,I discovered that Azharuddin was to be the next captain because someone was trying to speak to the President of the BCCI on a long distance line seeking his clearance. The selector could be over-ruled and that cannot be so.

Now,more than ever before,Indian cricket needs selectors of substance who can stand up to the ever increasing media pressure and exercise their judgement. There are decisions to be taken on the future of four or five of the very best that have played for the country. The easiest place to be a selector is in the media where you say your bit,remove your make-up and head off for dinner. These selectors cannot do that,they must live with their decision. I hope they make it,not become willing bystanders to someone else’s will.

Download the Indian Express apps for iPhone, iPad or Android