When India began its vaccination drive in January this year, it was widely expected that the “pharmacy of the world” would be a global leader in vaccine coverage. However, four striking features of failure are evident till April: Poor coverage; mismatch between targets and availability; geographical disparities in coverage; and bleak prospects for the future.
Let us consider the population that received at least one dose. Across the three phases of vaccination (healthcare and frontline workers, followed by those above 60 years and those above 45 years) till April 30, India vaccinated 12.7 crore persons. The total number of eligible persons across these three phases was 28.6 crore. On April 30, about 44 per cent of the eligible population was at least partially vaccinated. However, this quantum translated to only 13.5 per cent of the population above 18 years and just 9.2 per cent of the total population. In contrast, in the United States (50.4 per cent), United Kingdom (43.3), Germany (26.7) and Brazil (13.7), a much higher fraction of the total population received at least one dose till April 30.
As the eligible population rose from 3 crore to 13.8 crore to 28.6 crore across phases, the number of doses administered per day should have rapidly risen too. It did rise from 13 lakh in March 2021 to 25 lakh in April 2021. However, from 46.4 lakh first doses on April 7, the number fell to 15.7 lakh first doses on April 30.
An acute shortage of vaccines was the primary reason for this decline. Given the intellectual property rights on vaccines and near-exclusive licenses for Serum Institute of India (SII) and Bharat Biotech (BB), India’s production capacity was only about 25.3 lakh doses per day in April. Even if we consider the projections of capacity rise in May to 38 lakh doses per day, India’s vaccine availability per day would be lower than the number of doses administered on April 7. This indicates a more severe constraint on vaccine supplies than the capacity to administer vaccines.
Best of Express Premium
There were also major inter-state variations in vaccine distribution. For this analysis, we considered the number of total doses administered as a proxy for the number of doses allocated. Take phase 1. As state-wise data for frontline workers are not available, we considered the number of healthcare workers as a benchmark. The average doses administered per healthcare worker in India was 2.2. Several states administered at rates above the national average: Jharkhand (17.8), Chhattisgarh (8.2), Gujarat (2.8), Madhya Pradesh (2.5), Bihar (2.8), Odisha (2.7) and Haryana (2.4). Several other states administered at rates far below the national average: Tamil Nadu (0.5), Andhra Pradesh and Kerala (1.2), and Karnataka and Maharashtra (1.5). Thus, vaccine distribution in Phase 1 did not match the proportion of healthcare workers across states.
In phase 2, some states administered more than 0.5 doses per 60-plus person: Tripura (1.6), Rajasthan (0.7) and Gujarat and Chhattisgarh (0.6). But several highly populated states managed less than 0.25 doses per 60-plus person: Telangana (0.16), Punjab (0.19), Uttar Pradesh (0.20), Bihar (0.22) and Tamil Nadu (0.25).
In phase 3, there were states that administered more than 0.8 doses per 45-plus person: Himachal Pradesh (0.94) and Rajasthan (0.86). But several highly populated states managed less than 0.3 doses per 45-plus population: Bihar (0.3), Uttar Pradesh (0.22) and Tamil Nadu (0.29).
The formula used by the Union government to apportion vaccines across states is not publicly available. Even if we assume that “performance” was a criterion, these variations do not make sense. For example, per 60-plus person in Phase 2, a best performer like Kerala received 0.3 doses, while Gujarat and Rajasthan received 0.6 to 0.7 doses per eligible person.
To vaccinate everyone above 18 twice by January 2022, India would need at least 69 lakh doses per day. At an average rate of 25 lakh doses per day, India would cover less than 30 per cent of the 18-plus population by January 2022. Further, at the current rate, it would be 2023 till India can vaccinate everyone above 18 years.
The existing inter-state disparities in vaccine distribution is likely to worsen with the GoI limiting its purchase to only 50 per cent after May 1. The rest would be directly purchased from vaccine companies by states and private hospitals. As a result, inter-state vaccine allocation would be drained of all social criteria and based solely on commercial considerations.
The primary constraint would be vaccine availability. A press statement of the GoI, dated May 3, tells us that the Centre will receive 18.4 crore doses from SII and BB over May, June and July, which amounts to 20 lakh doses per day. As a result, states and private hospitals together would have only 8-10 lakh doses per day left. States may even be left with less than 8 lakh doses per day if vaccine companies have external commitments and/or contracts with private hospitals. If so, availability for states is likely to be much less than 30 per cent of the total production. If there is intense competition between states over this small quantity, the already existing inter-state disparity may only exacerbate.
In sum, GoI’s grand claims on vaccination are weak on evidence. Its vaccination plans were flawed on multiple counts. It is still not late. In phase 4, it should retreat from commercialisation of vaccine policy; it should consider compulsory licensing and mass production of vaccines; it should procure the vaccines directly from manufacturers and provide these free of cost to states; and a transparent and socially desirable formula should be used to distribute vaccines to states.
This article first appeared in the print edition on May 6, 2021 under the title ‘Vaccine reality check’. Ramakumar is professor, TISS, Mumbai; Kanitkar is associate professor, NIAS, Bangalore
📣 Join our Telegram channel (The Indian Express) for the latest news and updates
- The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.