By 2008,the Pink Tide had overwhelmed nearly half of the 20-odd Latin American countries,excluding permanently red Cuba. El Salvador and Peru were conquered subsequently,in 2009 and 2011 respectively. But by 2010,Chile and Honduras had already left the fold and Brazils Lula da Silva had made way for his protégé Dilma Rousseff. It was believed by all,except perhaps the starry-eyed hosts of late Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez in Kolkata and Delhis JNU,that the Pink Tide was ebbing. One look at the suicidal path taken by Christina Fernandez de Kirchner in Argentina,and you can rest assured that the Bolivarian revolution will end with Chavez.
As the Argentine economys implosion escalated,Kirchner emerged as the most zealous upholder of Chavismo. But the story of Chavez-ruled Venezuela,as expropriated by Chavistas,is also the story of what happened to Petróleos de Venezuela Sociedad Anónima (PDVSA),the oil giant the country was once synonymous with. The PDVSA,owned by Exxon till end-1975,was one of the best-run oil companies in the world even after its nationalisation by Carlos Perez. For,Perez had left its professional management untouched and allowed it to function as a private firm in practice,even though the state took the dough. But nothing would ever be the same again once Chavez took office in 1999.
To understand the significance of cash cow PDVSA to Chavismo,two facts need to be put on the table. First,whether or not Latin Americas pink presidents subscribed to Chavezs ideal of exporting the Bolivarian revolution,Chavez,especially after the failed 2002 coup against him,had embarked on cultivating anybody with tuppence worth of nasty things to say about the US. Thus alliances were forged with a veritable whos who of America haters Gaddafis Libya,North Korea,and Iran. More importantly,the Caribbean (via Petrocaribe) and left-ruled Latin American countries were flooded with subsidised oil some of them in fact sold part of their Venezuelan quota for a profit (the US,of course,paid market price). And at the heart of this petro-politics stood Cuba,whose moribund economy was kept alive by 100,000 barrels of subsidised Venezuelan oil a day while the Brothers Castro took over Chavezs foreign policy.
Second,while the above needed planting Rafael Ramirez,a top-notch Chavista,at the head of the PDVSA (Ramirez has also been the energy minister),the company itself became the bedrock of Chavezs domestic redistribution programme. He was not going to use oil money the way it is best used reinvesting in machinery and drilling,replacing and upgrading technology to sustain production and keep the economy in the pink of health (no irony intended). No,the PDVSAs pennies would be used for politics,to undertake social engineering.
In retrospect,Chavezs misiones needed a mismanaged PDVSA to pull Venezuelans out of poverty. That housing,educating and treating the poorest barrios in a terribly unequal country was an angelic thing to do is beyond question. But the central fallacy of welfare idealism is the illusion that wealth comes out of thin air,that the schemes will self-sustain and endure economic collapse. Global fans of Chavez wilfully refuse to see the clever and cynical arithmetic behind socialism a la Chavez. Clever because he was buying friends at home and abroad with PDVSAs cash. Cynical because Chavez could not have not known that,after him,it was the deluge. Just before he became president,PDVSA was producing 3.2-3.3 million barrels a day. After a decade of Chavismo,production stood at 2.4-2.2 MBD,a near-30 per cent fall. During Chavezs time in office,inflation averaged at 22 per cent,and net capital inflows fell from 2.9 per cent of GDP in 1999 to 1.7 per cent in 2011,coupled with rampant capital flight (data from World Bank and IMF). At his death,Venezuelas external debt stands at $90 billion. For all that,Chavezs socialist utopia is just an irreconcilably polarised Venezuela.
That oil states are ill-governed is a truism. Its their oil curse. By distorting the economy,oil pushes up the exchange rate and throttles exports and jobs by destroying other production. By staffing the PDVSA with loyalists to fund his populism,Chavez planned to break Venezuelas oil curse. What he did instead was bring the country back to the oil curse. At his death,oil constitutes 95 per cent of exports and Venezuela has no place else to run for revenue. Nor can China prop up the economy beyond a point.
Post-Chavez,Bolivias Evo Morales and Ecuadors Rafael Correa are safely ruled out to take the helm of the Latin American left,given their tiny economies. Cashless Kirchners
statist populism,the Argentine model,is discredited. Now,Latin Americas left faces a Hobsons choice junk Chavismo for Brazil,where Lula conducted a much more successful and sustainable social engineering and also exercised fiscal discipline. Marxist Lulas Brazil only made standard anti-imperialist noises,paying lip service to the Bolivarian revolution. It was never interested in leading it,and Lulas successor has to grapple with a stagnating economy. More importantly,the rest of Latin America cannot hold a candle to Brazil. After Chavez,nobody will march with Fidel.
📣 The Indian Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@indianexpress) and stay updated with the latest headlines
- John le Carré— The Biography review: Coming in From the Cold
Having turned 84 last month, John le Carré, aka David (John Moore) Cornwell, knows that he isn’t around for too long. His decision, four years…
- The End of Innocence
The publicity about Watchman has ensured that the reader comes to the book fully aware that her hero has been morally shrunk into a bigot...
- Why India-Israel partnership is about surviving coming storms
Behind India’s abstention on the anti-Israel vote in UN last week lies the message that its relationship with Israel should be read on its own…