BBC documentary on PM Modi: To the person sitting in darkness

What Dr Mansoor has clearly missed in his piece is the moral landscape which stretches in the storytelling of mass killings. This landscape is full of unmarked allegations and assertions as well as untold truth. It’s like those unmarked graves that harbour the corpses of the murdered but without proof of the culpability of the perpetrator. Documentaries like the one in question are a documentation of the event. Before we decide whether it’s valid or not, let us first establish what it wants us to hear. It is imperative that we respect this documentation, and listen to the white, black or brown man who is telling that story. By targeting the narrator, we kill the story. I am sure that’s not what the vice-chancellor of a prominent university was aiming to do, even if it happens to be an opportunity to be in the good books of the regime.

The Gujarat riots of 2002 are a blot on the face of the country. Dr Mansoor’s lack of exploration of the moral landscape of those times makes him argue that the Muslims of India no longer live in the past. True. Unfortunately, the past has been brighter than the present. Dr Mansoor should realise that not living in the past is not a choice for Indian Muslims, it’s a compulsion to salvage self in the crisis of today.

Imagine Dr Mansoor’s “not live in the past” argument in the context of the anti-Sikh riots of 1984. A group of these survivors was rehabilitated in a dilapidated building in a congested Delhi locality. This cohort only had women and children. A whole generation of children thus grew up in this building without any male (read father) figure. Can we even imagine the mental state of these kids? To tell this generation to stop living in the past is like violently shaking a comatose man to wake him up. The erasure of past can only happen with compassion and care, definitely not by stalling documentation of, and debate on, that dubious past. “Fake godparents” (as Dr Mansoor calls them) of the brutalised do exactly that — they try to induce compassion and debate. They don’t push the victim into the past but hold their hands in that past and walk them into the present.

The mention of India’s good relations with the Islamic states of West Asia by Dr Mansoor is also worthy of note. Dr Mansoor, who surprisingly uses a lot of “left” jargon in this piece (colonialism, imperialism, etc), forgot a very simple left argument — nothing is bigger in the world than capital. India is a bubbling market of 130 billion consumers. No country on the planet would miss an opportunity to tap this market. The Islamic countries of West Asia are well entrenched in this neoliberal capitalist order and to believe that they would speak for human rights somewhere else would be inanity par excellence. The stink of human rights violations in their own backyard should actually be a rallying point for democratic countries like ours.

The points enumerated by Dr Mansoor make me sad not because he is playing the game by the rules of the regime but because he is a teacher. As a teacher, he has the responsibility to educate. The arguments laid by him are devoid of sensitivity. Sadly, he is Mark Twain’s person sitting in darkness. As a surgeon, he should have dissected the BBC documentary to try and search for answers to the questions it raises. The current communal crisis of India is serious. In the centuries to come, when the torchlight of history shines on us, we shouldn’t appear naked with blood on our hands. We should be a model civilisation worth emulating.

The writer is professor, Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi. Views are personal