scorecardresearch
Follow Us:
Wednesday, October 28, 2020

A cut in time saves nine

Delay in cutting interest rates would imply that the RBI is looking to bet on a horse after it has won the race.

Written by Surjit S Bhalla | Updated: November 7, 2014 12:56:40 am
'Time to deliver begins now. We need to focus on deliverables,' tweet quoting Raghuram Rajan said. (Reuters) There are also the recent converts to a rate cut — the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) to the RBI voted 4-3 to cut rates at its September meeting.

The camp is clearly divided — the “bad” industrialists, the ones who always say that the Union budget deserves 8+ /10, are saying the time has come for the RBI to relax its ultra-tight monetary policy, prevailing for most of the last few years, and especially since September 2013, when Raghuram Rajan assumed control. There are also the recent converts to a rate cut — the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) to the RBI voted 4-3 to cut rates at its September meeting.

In the other corner are the “good” guys, comprising, besides Rajan and his deputy Urjit Patel, the prestigious IMF economists and the policy economists at the major investment houses (both domestic and international) and rating agencies like Crisil. Their view is that the clamour for a rate cut now is bordering on nonsense. This is what one representative of this distinguished club (Crisil) stated on November 2: “The chorus on an interest rate cut to revive the economy has got louder with the recent climbdown in inflation. To be sure, the monetary policy tool of cutting the interest rate is conventionally used to energise a flagging economy… But this does not hold true under all circumstances. Our study shows that factors behind the recent slowdown in economic growth and investment in India have little to do with high interest rates… leaning on monetary policy to revive investments will yield little benefit. And, it carries the risk of reversing the recent gains in inflation, which, in any case, is nothing much to write home about” (emphasis added).

In a November 4 editorial, the newspaper Mint confidently stated that declining CPI inflation was due to a tight monetary policy and equally confidently forecast the future path of inflation: “[The RBI should] stay on course for at least a couple of more quarters, rather than act in a hurry… tightening of policy since Rajan took charge is one important reason why inflation has begun to decline in India… It is not yet clear whether the recent sharp decline in inflation is sustainable or a temporary base effect… Yet, this base effect is expected to wear off in the first three months of 2015… It is only after April that we can get a clear picture about inflation.”

So who is right and, therefore, what should the RBI do? It should go by the evidence — and the evidence is that, from the demand (output) side, the economy is hurting, and hurting bad. In normal circumstances, this large negative gap alone would justify a series of large rate cuts.

But India, at least until recently, was not a normal economy, especially with low growth and high inflation. This strange combination should have given a clue to experts that it wasn’t monetary policy causing the high inflation, but rather a cost-push supply-side inflation, over which the monetary authorities had precious little control.

The question is whether India is fast approaching normality with respect to inflation. Consider the following facts. CPI inflation of 6.5 per cent (new 2010 series) was the lowest rate ever in September 2014, that is, the lowest for the last 45 months. A weighted average of the two old series — rural CPI(AL) and urban CPI(IW) — yields a national CPI series that was the lowest since the 6.0 per cent inflation observed in February 2008, that is, the lowest in 78 months. WPI inflation of 2.7 per cent is the lowest since the 4.7 per cent level of September 2009 — the lowest in 60 months. The government-administered minimum support price (MSP) inflation of 2.7 per cent in 2014 is the fifth lowest in 39 years, and the lowest since the 2.4 per cent level observed in 2005 — lowest in 108 months.

But this is not considered even admissible evidence for a rate cut by our base-effect vigilantes. Something that has baffled me in reading the various expert reports for the last several years is the constant allusion to “base effects” — and intrigued me because of the dangerous, and disingenuous, interpretation of the base-effect reality. If an inflation estimate comes in below the “expert” view, the refrain is, “This is due to the base effect” and soon inflation will rise again. If inflation comes in high as per the expert prediction, the base effect is not invoked, and instead we get: “We told you so.”

What is this base-effect and how does one measure it? Assume for a moment that year-on-year September 2013 inflation was higher than normal. Then, one should expect, ceteris paribus, that September 2014 inflation will be lower than normal. But this begs the question — what is “normal” inflation in any given month? One reasonable approximation for normal inflation for any month is a three-year average. For example, average September CPI inflation for the previous three years (2010, 2011 and 2012) was 9.7 per cent, and this is the expected normal inflation estimate for September 2013. Actual September 2013 inflation was 9.4 per cent, which is 0.3 per cent below normal. Hence, the base-effect for September 2014 is plus 0.3 per cent, that is, expected inflation in September 2014 is the previous three-year average of 9.7 per cent plus 0.3 per cent, or 10.0 per cent.

This forecasting game (no economics, no modelling, no nothing) yielded brilliant results during the steady near-10 per cent inflation between January 2011 and June 2013; an average forecast error of only 0.1 per cent (!), with the worst and best forecasts of -1.4 and 1.1 per cent, respectively (see chart). However, the simplistic base-effect model has completely broken down since June 2013, with average forecast errors of -1.0 per cent (July to December 2013) and -3.1 per cent January-September 2014.

This explains both the confidence of the base-effect calculators (and this includes the RBI and the IMF) till some 15 months ago and their complete lack of credibility today. Which means that the RBI has now lost both its legs in support of a tight monetary policy — base-effect and anchoring of inflationary expectations. Regarding the latter, the junk RBI expectations survey (when will they stop?) in March 2014 reported a three-month expectation of 12.9 per cent inflation. Actual September 2014 inflation was almost half at 6.5 per cent (and was 7.4 per cent for the June-September quarter). And the expectation of three-month inflation in September 2014 is an even more junk estimate of 14.6 per cent! Let me restate the finding: actual inflation in September 2014 is 6.5 per cent, the RBI’s anchoring inflation expectations survey claims more than a doubling of inflation in the next three months! Somebody is smoking something, please pass the weed.

It is time the base-effect and other inflation hawks admitted to a few realities and moved on. One of the most important lessons the financial markets teach you is humility — and the fact that very smart people, and very dumb people, and everyone in between, make mistakes every day. So what is the harm in the RBI, and IMF, and investment bank experts, and three members of the TAC, admitting they were wrong and asking, nay pleading, for an aggressive interest rate cut policy?

If they don’t do so, my guess is that history will judge them harshly. Expertise and/ or wisdom is not revealed by betting on a horse after it has won the race.

The writer is chairman of Oxus Investments, an emerging market advisory firm, and a senior advisor to Zyfin, a leading financial information company

📣 The Indian Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@indianexpress) and stay updated with the latest headlines

For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App.

0 Comment(s) *
* The moderation of comments is automated and not cleared manually by indianexpress.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement