A class of his own

Rural constituencies of Gujarat are the only places where more voters support the Congress,while semi-urban and urban constituencies are almost fully behind the BJP. But the urban/rural divide is a proxy for class. What the above data shows is simply that caste identities — and caste-related political cultures — are submerged by class considerations when formerly rural groups come to the city,hoping to join the lower middle class. Their new ethos — or at least their aspirations — make them turn to Modi’s BJP and its promise of jobs in the name of “development”.

The propensity of the neo-middle class to support Modi’s BJP in Gujarat can be easily explained without even factoring in the communal element (although it is arguably more developed in the urban context,notably because of recurring riots). The BJP of Gujarat simply paid more attention to the material interests of the urban middle class than to any other group,as is evident from its election manifesto. Among the relevant items of this carefully drafted document,one can cite the promise to construct 50 lakh houses,the increase of the age limit for entry into government jobs from 25 to 28,English medium schools,Rs 2,000 crore for flyovers and underpasses in cities,the building of mono rail in places other than Ahmedabad (where the project has already been planned) and insurance schemes. These are,typically,promises aiming at wooing the urban middle class.

But there’s no need to further scrutinise pre-electoral promises. The actual polarisation of Gujarat’s society speaks for itself. Modi’s policy,over the last 10 years,has benefited the urban middle class more than anybody else. If Gujarat ranks only 11th out of 23 states in terms of the human development index,it’s because groups in rural Gujarat continue to lag behind. Indeed,Gujarat is a case of social polarisation with the new rich in the cities and most of the groups that are at the receiving end concentrated in the villages. There,the number of families below the poverty line has jumped from 23.39 lakh in 2000 to 30.49 lakh in July 2012,according to the rural development commissioner. Unsurprisingly,9 lakh of the 11 lakh houses without electricity,according to the Gujarat 2011 census,are in rural areas. In terms of education,the excellent report of the NGO,Pratham,shows that rural Gujarat was lagging behind states like Haryana.

Dalits and Adivasis (11.3 and 16.5 per cent of the state population,respectively) are particularly affected. For instance,the percentage of tribal underweight children (0-5 years old) is much higher in Gujarat than the tribal average at the national level (64.5 per cent compared to 54.5 per cent). The under-five mortality rate of tribal children is also much higher. Similarly,the percentage of Dalit participation in the NREGA programme is three times less in Gujarat (7.83 per cent) than in India at large (22.67 per cent). In fact,development has meant socio-economic polarisation,because Gujarat is a typical case of growth without development for all. The Gujarat chapter of the India Human Development Report of 2011 concluded that “the high growth rate achieved by the state over the years has not percolated to the marginalised sections of society,particularly STs and SCs,to help improve their human development outcomes”.

That the middle class cares only for its interests is fair enough. But over the last two years,it has seemed that it was more and more concerned by corruption and the criminalisaton of politics — evident from the Anna Hazare movement which,arguably,was driven by the middle class.

Here,the record of Gujarat suggests a paradox. In this state,the middle class supports the BJP government in spite of uneven indicators in terms of the rule of law and a number of tainted former members of the government on the radar screen of the judiciary. Today,five Gujarat-based police officials — including senior IPS officers — are behind bars,waiting for their trial in Mumbai. They’ve been accused of being responsible for at least one of the many alleged fake encounters that have taken place in the years 2003-2006 in Gujarat. The most famous of these cases are those regarding Sohrabuddin,his wife Kauser bi and their friend Tulsiram Prajapati.

The CBI,in its chargesheet,named Amit Shah,the then minister of state for home,as the kingpin of the conspiracy. He was arrested in 2010,spent over three months in jail and,while on bail,was not allowed to return to Gujarat,lest he interfere with the investigators. He came back two months before the last state elections,was re-elected and,by all accounts,has again become a close aide of the chief minister. Maya Kodnani,also a former member of the state government,has been convicted for involvement in the 2002 violence in Ahmedabad. The Supreme Court has ordered the transfer of several cases to Maharashtra “to preserve the integrity of the trial”.

BJP president Rajnath Singh has not only inducted Narendra Modi into the party’s apex decision-making bodies,the parliamentary board and central election committee,but he has also appointed Amit Shah as one of the general secretaries of the party. And among the new national council members from Gujarat,figures also Babubhai Katara,a former BJP MP from Dahod who had been arrested in 2007 for human trafficking and was suspended from the party.

In this context,L.K. Advani has lectured his colleagues to ensure that the BJP remained “a party with a difference”. But was it because the middle class cares for political cleanliness?

The writer is a senior research fellow at CERI,Sciences Po,Paris and professor of Indian politics and society at the King’s India Institute,London,and non-resident fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for Peace

express@expressindia.com