Follow Us:
Thursday, July 07, 2022

1963, still

India’s ostrich-like approach to archival material makes 1962 war an unresolved moment in history.

March 19, 2014 12:43:28 am

India’s ostrich-like approach to archival material makes 1962 war an unresolved moment in history.

Substantial parts of what is said to be the Henderson Brooks report on military operations leading up to and during the 1962 India-China war have been put online, causing a stir. Predictably so. Ever since Chinese troops breezed across the McMahon Line into Indian territory before abruptly withdrawing, India’s sense of vulnerability has not been mitigated.

The overhang of the episode draws in part from questions about India’s military preparedness in the face of China’s periodic assertions of claims to Arunachal Pradesh and also the lingering shock of that invasion. The latter is particularly exacerbated by the fact that India’s leadership has never quite levelled with the people in an open accounting for what exactly happened, and how. The silence of the political leadership is best evident in the refusal to declassify the Henderson Brooks report, to even make available portions of it to scholars.

Neville Maxwell, a journalist who reported on the war and whose account, India’s China War, was long believed to have drawn on a reading of the report, has unilaterally made a copy available. The report, commissioned in the aftermath of the war by the then army chief, General J.N. Chaudhuri, and prepared by Lieutenant General Henderson Brooks and Brigadier P.S. Bhagat, was submitted in April 1963.

Best of Express Premium
Newsmaker | Now in charge of UP health, Deputy CM Brajesh Pathak’s ...Premium
Bihar college teacher listens to ‘conscience’, returns 33-month salary ov...Premium
New car insurance plan: Premium based on usage, driving behaviourPremium
Newsmaker | Transport business to casinos, in driver’s seat and out...Premium

This is the first time the contents have been spilt (online, as it happens, and therefore freely available) and it requires an enlightened response from the executive and politicians in the midst of the election campaign. Across time, the lesson that needs to be taken is not the roll call of culpability — though that’s a matter for necessary study. Nehru, in fact, paid politically for his coterie’s Himalayan misadventure, and never recovered his earlier stature.

There needs, instead, be a thorough reading of the report and the manner of its eventual public availability for a tutorial on India’s inexplicably ostrich-like approach to archival material. If today we are reacting to the report as if it were still 1963, given the lack of clarity on military assessment of operational details, it reflects the state’s reluctance to allow access to material essential for proper history writing, the kind of history without which there cannot be coherent and informed public debate.

There is no point in the BJP now holding forth on why the report was not declassified. In its years in power (1998-2004), it too did precious little to open up access to official documents. But then, why blame the opposition when the Congress-led government is not doing enough to raise the level of debate.

Express Explained Go beyond the news. Understand the headlines with our Explained stories

📣 Join our Telegram channel (The Indian Express) for the latest news and updates

For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App.

  • Newsguard
  • The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
  • Newsguard
0 Comment(s) *
* The moderation of comments is automated and not cleared manually by