The Supreme Court is scrutinising a PIL seeking re-confirmation on whether Hoshnar Kapadia,a chartered accountant employed at Ernst and Young,is the son of Chief Justice of India Sarosh Homi Kapadia.
The petition filed by advocate Manohar Lal Sharma alleges that if Hoshnar,senior manager at Ernst and Young (India),is indeed identified as the CJIs son,it would mean that Kapadia had all along heard the Vodafone tax case without having disclosed that his son worked at the very consultancy firm that advised Vodafone Group in 2007 on Hutchison Whampoa Ltd deal.
On January 20,2012,a majority judgment authored by Chief Justice Kapadia had declared that the Income Tax department has no jurisdiction to tax the $11.076-billion offshore deal.
The petition alleges foul play by telecom and finance ministries,Vodafone,Hutchison Whampoa and Analjit Singh,the newly appointed chairman of Vodafone India Ltd.
It comes shortly after the government has filed for a review of the January 20 judgment.
The SC judgment dated January 20,2012 has considered due diligence report filed by Ernst and Young in which Hoshnar is also working as a senior manager since 2008. It is also true that our Chief Justice of India has a son,Hoshnar Kapadia,who is also a chartered accountant. It is a subject matter of re-conformation whether he is the son of our honourable CJI or not, Sharmas PIL says. Sharma says if the answer is yes to his question,an unexpected scenario arises whereby the CJIs judgment in the case should be scrapped and the matter be posted for fresh hearing before a constitutional bench.
Sharma adds that he has no doubt about the integrity or honesty of our CJI. Official sources declined to comment on the issue.
Hoshnar was not with E&Y India when E&Y UK gave advice to Vodafone from December 2006 to May 2008. He was with a competing firm,KPMG,at the time. Hoshnar had joined E&Y India on July 9,2008. E&Y is a large multinational and Hoshnar works in the financial sector vertical of E&Y India,which had nothing to do with the department that gave the advice. What is the conflict of interest here? said advocate Harish Salve,who represented Vodafone in the tax litigation at the SC.
Who is this man anyway? He was not even a party in the case. If there was reason to object,either the Government of India or Vodafone would have done that. He is just seeking his moment of glory before the media, Salve said.
Sharmas other PILs in the SC
* PIL asking Gandhi family to give him Power of Attorney to collect money from the alleged Swiss Bank account of Rajiv Gandhi. Dismissed.
* PIL for CBI inquiry into the disproportionate assets of former CJI KG Balakrishnan. A Bench headed by CJI Kapadia is hearing the matter.
* PIL questioning candidature of Pratibha Patil as President. Dismissed.
* PIL against Anna Hazare alleging siphoning of government funds by Hind Swaraj Trust of which the Gandhian was a member. SC seeks response from Maharashtra government and Centre.
* PIL alleging that since 2005,the Ford Foundation has been funding Team Anna for its fight against corruption. Dismissed.