This is an archive article published on March 25, 2012
Premium

The Idea of Authenticity

Why originality means different things to different people.

Written by: Advaita Kala
5 min readNew DelhiMar 25, 2012 01:51 AM IST First published on: Mar 25, 2012 at 01:51 AM IST

Why originality means different things to different people.

I have been thinking about the idea of authenticity for a while,particularly now that fusion cuisine is in such flourish. It is the sort of culinary seesaw that engages ones epicuriosity. In wide ranging conversations with chefs across culinary disciplines,authenticity has become an oft-repeated term. Its a trend now,and one not necessarily born out of whimsy or as a reaction to fusion cuisine,but possibly out of necessity. With the Indian diner travelling,experiencing international cuisine in home countries as well as acquainting themselves with regional Indian cuisine,the discerning diner can tell his yam cha from his dim sum. So what is authentic? Chef Arun Kumar,executive chef of the Zambar chain of restaurants serving south Indian coastal food,refuses to use the term authentic he insists on traditional instead. There is a reason I want to speak to him,he is a natural chef,having never spent a day in a culinary school and hopefully,not one with set ideas of culinary aesthetics. He decided to turn professional at the age of 50. Kitchens are notoriously ageist. Young,strappy unskilled men are hired for commis positions mostly for their hardiness and stamina. Speak to any chef over 35,and unless hes been very fortunate,he/she will have some physical ailment to slow him down. The kitchen is a demanding master,with long working hours,the necessity to be on one’s feet through the day,rare breaks and the proximity to oppressive heat.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments