Follow Us:
Saturday, August 20, 2022

Hashtag activism and its limits

If you “like” something,does that mean you care about it? It’s an important distinction in an age when you can accumulate social currency on Facebook or Twitter


If you “like” something,does that mean you care about it? It’s an important distinction in an age when you can accumulate social currency on Facebook or Twitter just by hitting the “like” or “favourite” button. But it gets more complicated when the subjects are more complicated. In the friction-free atmosphere of the Internet,it costs nothing more than a flick of the mouse to register concern about the casualties of far-flung conflicts. In February,the digiterati went bonkers after the Susan G Komen foundation (shorthanded as #Komen on Twitter) announced it was cutting off financing for Planned Parenthood. And then #KONY2012 started popping up in my Twitter feed and I,along with 100 million others,watched a video about the indicted Ugandan war criminal Joseph Kony.

After weeks of remaining under the radar,#TrayvonMartin began to surface as well,with many suggesting that the people who got so frantic about the victimisation of young black males on another continent needed to look closer to home,at the death of an unarmed black teenager in Florida.

As a reporter,I don’t sign up for various causes,but as someone who lives—far too much —in the world of social media,I can feel the pull of digital activism. And I have to admit I’m starting to experience a kind of “favouriting” fatigue—meaning that the digital causes of the day or week are all starting to blend together.

Subscriber Only Stories
Jobs to roads to sports university — the many projects on Sisodia’s platePremium
Delhi Confidential: British High Commissioner to India trolls Manchester ...Premium
As chip shortage bites, companies cut down features to reduce delayPremium
Independence Day’s end: The mystery of the files missing from Tripura Pol...Premium

I ended up thinking a lot about the power and limits of digital activism earlier this month when I was in Moscow during the Russian presidential vote. I spent election night with Aleksei Navalny,a Russian blogger who had become a tip of the spear in the social media campaign against the current government. On that night,camera crews from around the world swirled around him and it seemed as if anything was possible.

But by the next day,it was clear that Vladimir V Putin would retain his grip on power,and Navalny ended up posting on Twitter from police custody when he was arrested after an opposition rally. Social media activism may prove to be a durable force in Russian politics,but in these early days it is no match for offline might.

Evgeny Morozov,the author of The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom,is sceptical of the motives,and power,of digital activism. “My hunch is that people often affiliate with causes online for selfish and narcissistic purposes,” he said. Which brings us to the online campaign denouncing the fact that Bully,a movie about child-on-child harassment and violence to be released Friday,has received an R rating from the Motion Picture Association of America’s ratings board. I have watched the evocative trailer for the movie and met the director,Lee Hirsch. On Thursday,word came that David Boies and Ted Olson,the attorneys who were on the opposite sides of the Bush v Gore Supreme Court case,had joined the effort to persuade the motion picture association to change the film’s R rating to PG-13,so that the young people most affected by the issue could actually see the movie. Celebrities and politicians have weighed in,as have more than 460,000 people who’ve signed an online petition demanding that the rating be changed.


The petition was started by a teenager,Katy Butler,who was bullied for being a lesbian,and has blown up huge on Twitter and elsewhere.

“We were absolutely disappointed with the rating,” says Hirsch. He said the petition came out of nowhere. “I got an e-mail the day after it started and I have watched it rising since.”

I called Christopher J Dodd,the former senator who now runs the motion picture association and who was on the receiving end of a full-fledged Web revolt after his organisation’s support of unpopular piracy legislation in January. I expected him to suggest that all the online petitioners had failed to grasp the nuance and importance of the ratings system. Not so. “These are our customers and it behooves us to listen to them,” he said.


That outcome—a very traditional organisation responding with an open mind to a netroots outcry—made me think again about my own cynicism about Web activism. Many of the folks who made the unpopular decision at Komen are gone and the policy has been amended. Trayvon Martin’s death is under investigation and the president is now weighing in directly. And who knows,perhaps the Web-enabled sunlight on Joseph Kony will end with him being brought to justice,finally.

Sure,hashtags come and go,and the so-called weak ties of digital movements are no match for real world engagement. But they are not only better than nothing,they probably make the world,the one beyond the keyboard,a better place.

First published on: 27-03-2012 at 03:58:56 am
Next Story

Satluj power corp sets high generation targets

Featured Stories