scorecardresearch
Thursday, Dec 08, 2022

Election Result LIVE

Premium

Green Tribunal Bill: Young Turks convince Jairam to bring in changes

Young Lok Sabha MPs,aided by some of their senior colleagues,on Wednesday managed to extract an assurance of desired amendments in the Green Tribunal Bill from Environment Minister Jairam Ramesh.....

Young Lok Sabha MPs,aided by some of their senior colleagues,on Wednesday managed to extract an assurance of desired amendments in the Green Tribunal Bill from Environment Minister Jairam Ramesh. “The members have made important suggestions. Even though their exact demands may not be part of the official amendments moved by the government… but I am open to their suggestions…I will remove all objectionable clauses or sections in the proposed law and keep the window of discussion open,” Jairam Ramesh said after the completion of arguments by the MPs.

First it was BJD’s Kalikesh Narayan Singh Deo (36),who picked up specific sections and sub-clauses — Section 14,15,18 — of the Bill to drive home the point that it fell short on the parameters of “scope,efficiency,and access to justice”. “While Section 14 fixes a rigid timeframe of six months for filing a complaint,Section 15 fixes a rigid timeframe of five years to claim compensation…Knowing the nature of different environmental damages like groundwater pollution and radiation effects,among others,these provisions would devoid the local community to seek damages,” Deo argued,pointing out other issues which got a patient hearing from Ramesh.

After Deo,it was CPM’s M B Rajesh (39),who while echoing his party’s stand alleging “corporate orientation” of the Bill,pointed out loopholes in Sections 4,5,6 ,15(3),22(2),28 and demanded widening the culpability of offences and increasing the penal provisions. “Section 28 puts a bar on the civil courts jurisdiction while promising to set up five benches of Tribunal in the country. This would create huge distance for the poor community members and tribals to seek justice,” Rajesh said.

Deo and Rajesh came down heavily against narrowing the culpability of offences by violators as the Forest Rights Act,Wildlife Protection Act,and PESA have been left out of the Bill. They were supported by RLD’s Jayant Chaudhary (32). “The provisions put local community at disadvantage,” he argued.

Subscriber Only Stories
UPSC Key- December 8, 2022: Why you should read ‘Current Repo Rate’ or ‘C...Premium
Parliament passes Wildlife Bill: Questions remain on elephants, verminPremium
As Chandigarh adds 120 new vehicles a day, the big debate: Does city need...Premium
What seems to have hurt BJP most in Himachal: Unhappiness with CM, factio...Premium

BSP’s Vijay Bahadur Singh said,“Section 15 puts an embargo against other than retired Judge of Supreme Court or Chief Justices of High Court. The other clause puts 15 years of administrative experience,which would open the path for packing the Tribunal with bureaucrats of the kind who did not enforce the environment related laws in their time in service.”

First published on: 22-04-2010 at 01:10:14 am
Next Story

HP plans stringent penalty clauses under polyhouse scheme

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
close