Gilgit-Baltistan: A question of autonomy

Gilgit-Baltistan: A question of autonomy

The Gilgit-Baltistan Empowerment and Self Governance Order announced by the Pakistan government early this month caused a...

The Gilgit-Baltistan Empowerment and Self Governance Order announced by the Pakistan government early this month caused a flurry of protests in New Delhi’s diplomatic circles as the territory falls within the contentious Jammu and Kashmir disputed area. The issue:

What are the Northern Areas?

Of the Kashmiri territory occupied by Pakistan in 1947-48,the Sunni majority areas were constituted by it into a separate administrative unit which Pakistan calls “Azad Kashmir” and India calls “Pakistan-occupied Kashmir”. The Shia majority areas of Gilgit and Baltistan,which were known before 1947 as the Northern Areas of Jammu & Kashmir and which had been given on lease by the pre-1947 ruler of Jammu & Kashmir to the British,were incorporated into Pakistan and have been directly ruled from Islamabad.

Why have they been in the news recently?

The Pakistan government approved a self-governance and reforms package for the Northern Areas which entails that the strategically-located Northern Areas will have rights akin to those of Pakistan’s four provinces,(Punjab,Sind,NWFP,Balochistan). The “Gilgit- Baltistan Empowerment and Self Governance Order 2009” also aims at giving the Northern Areas “full internal autonomy” and changing the region’s name to Gilgit-Baltistan. Under the new system,the Northern Areas will have a province-like status without actually being conferred such a status constitutionally. The region will vote for a legislative assembly,elections to which are to be held in the next three months and a chief minister will govern the region,replacing direct rule by Islamabad

What is the strategic importance of the area?

The Northern Areas have immense strategic significance as they border the North West Frontier Province to the west,Afghanistan and China to the north and Jammu and Kashmir to the east. Islamabad had transferred territory from these areas to China in 1963 under the Sino-Pakistan Border Agreement and it is through the Northern Areas,which border China’s Xinjiang Province,that the Chinese,in collaboration with Pakistani army engineers,built the Karakoram Highway connecting them with China. Moreover,China has,through its links with the Northern Areas,become a part of the Kashmir problem. It has poured money and men into developing transport links and undertaking major projects in Gilgit- Baltistan,and analysts claim that it is only a matter of time before the Northern Areas get integrated into Western China’s economic profile.

Why the need for special status?


So far,it is the Pakistani military that has a major say in the governance of the region with its people forbidden to participate in parliamentary elections. A deep-seated sense of alienation prevails among the residents (who are not citizens of Pakistan),who feel they have been discriminated against in comparison with the ‘special status’ of Azad Kashmir’ (a self-governing state under Pakistan’s control). The present package,which goes further than any previous attempt to redress the grievances of the area,has also received the support of the main Opposition,Pakistan Muslim League (N). But it falls short of the main demand of the people of Gilgit- Baltistan for a constitutional status to the region as a fifth province and for Pakistani citizenship to its people. The Balwaristan National Front (Balwaristan is the historical name for the Northern Areas) is fighting to get the status of a separate nation comprising Gilgit-Baltistan ,Chitral and Shhenaki Kohistan.

What is India’s reaction to the proposal?

India had lodged a protest over the Gilgit-Baltistan order on the grounds that the entire state of J&K is an integral part of India. While the moderate faction of the Hurriyat leadership has said that the devolution of power to the Northern Areas will not come in the way of the final resolution of the Kashmir dispute,Hurriyat hardliner Syed Ali Shah Geelani has said that Gilgit and Baltistan are a part of J&K and there is no justification for any modification,ironically throwing his weight behind Indian opposition to the proposal albeit for different reasons (Geelani advocates Kashmir’s accession to Pakistan).