scorecardresearch
Tuesday, Dec 06, 2022
Premium

CAT rules CBDT member Basu’s appointment ‘illegal’

A recent order by the Central Administrative Tribunal has questioned the selection process adopted by the revenue department for members in the Central Board of Direct Taxes.

A recent order by the Central Administrative Tribunal has questioned the selection process adopted by the revenue department for members in the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT).

The September 2 order has backed the plea of petitioner,Chief Commissioner Laxman Das,and ruled that,among others,he should have been appointed Member by the Review Selection Committee for the year 1010-2011. When contacted,CBDT officials told The Indian Express it was for the revenue department to decide whether to appeal against the order or to reconvene the selection panel.

In the order,CAT has declared as “illegal” the appointment of A K Basu as a member since he had less than one year of residual service and was hence not eligible.

Demanding that the appointment be set aside,the order said,“We further direct that the Review Selection Committee shall be convened to consider the application of Shri Laxman Das for the post of Member-CBDT within a period of three months…the official respondents have faulted in including the names of such persons in the zone of consideration who are not eligible.’’

Subscriber Only Stories
UPSC Key- December 6, 2022: Why you should read ‘Central Asia Region’ or ...Premium
What is OpenAI’s ChatGPT chatbot, why it has become a viral sensationPremium
How a private firm came to be at the centre of Bengaluru data theft casePremium
Why the G7’s oil price cap is unlikely to impact RussiaPremium

The order reveals that of the 22 Indian Revenue Service officers considered and cleared by the Selection Committee,the CVC denied vigilance clearance for one officer since there were major penalty proceedings pending against him. In respect of four other officers,it said the CVC had observed that “certain matters were pending/under process and they advised that the factual position in respect of the impugned matters concerning them should be placed before the Competent Authority while it would decide the suitability of these officers for selection.’’

The order then describes how the Selection Committee went through the details of the “pending matters’’ and noted that the CVC had neither denied them vigilance clearance nor was any disciplinary action “pending or contemplated’’ against them. The committee,therefore,decided not to exclude them from their place in the panel for appointment as members.

First published on: 09-09-2011 at 12:24:47 am
Next Story

Reporter,three others held for kidnapping SP leader

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
close