The storm surrounding the death of a Dalit youth,whose marriage to a caste Hindu girl had set off communal passions in pockets across the state,continued unabated on Friday,with the Madras High Court eventually ruling that his body be preserved till Tuesday so that a second autopsy could be done if necessary.
Such was the flurry of activities a day after E Ilavarasan was found dead on a railway track behind Dharmapuri Government Arts College that three division benches of the high court heard different petitions related to his ill-fated marriage with Divya Nagarajan,its aftermath and eventual separation,his death,and her future.
The developments leading to his death created suspicions in the minds of Ilavarasans relatives,who demanded that the autopsy be conducted in Coimbatore or Chennai,in the presence of a doctor of their choice. The district administration and police tried to convince them to go ahead with the autopsy,assuring that the entire procedure would be videographed. But the family refused to accept the body till their demands were met.
When R Sankarasubbu,the counsel who has been representing Ilavarasan in the habeas corpus case filed by Divyas mother Thenmozhi,mentioned the familys demand before a Division Bench at noon,state public prosecutor S Shanmugavelayutham said the autopsy had already been conducted by a team of doctors,including two forensic experts and a general physician. He said the four-hour autopsy concluded at 11 am.
Sankarasubbu then told the court that Dharmapuri SP had assured him in the morning that the autopsy would not begin before 11.30 am. The Bench comprising Justices V Dhanapalan and C T Selvam finally directed the authorities to hand over copies of the autopsy report and video of the procedure to Ilavarasans father Elangovan. The body should be preserved till Tuesday,when the case will be heard again,so that a second examination could be conducted if suspicions persisted.
Ilavarasans body has now been kept at the mortuary of the government hospital at Dharmapuri.
In the afternoon,another Bench of Justices M Jaichandren and M M Sundresh,acting on a PIL,directed authorities to provide necessary protection to Divya,her mother and brother. It also directed the district administration to depute a suitable officer to meet the family in person and ascertain if they required counselling.
Senior advocate R Vaigai argued there was a risk of Divya internalising the deaths of her father,who committed suicide after her marriage,and husband with a sense of guilt,which would be worsened by societal pressure especially in a rural environment like Dharmapuri. The family should be brought to Chennai and she should be offered counselling. We dont want to see another death, she added.
Another Bench comprising Justices R Banumathi and T S Sivagnanam adjourned a batch of PILs in connection with the communal violence in Dharmapuri after Ilavarasan married Divya and her father committed suicide. It will be taken up again on July 19.
Meanwhile,Ilavarasans father Elangovan blamed PMK leader S Ramadoss,his son Anbumani Ramadoss,party president G K Mani,former MP R Senthil and a few others for his sons death. The PMK,drawing flak for allegedly exploiting the issue to regain political significance,dismissed the allegation with Senthil insisted that it was a case of suicide.