Monday, Dec 05, 2022

Removing black carbon may lead to warming

Consistent with findings by scientists elsewhere,an Indian researcher says removal of black carbon may do more harm than good to the earth’s climate

The international debate on Black Carbon (BC),believed to be a potent greenhouse gas,may see a fresh twist. An Indian scientist who is part of the core group in India’s Black Carbon Research Initiative has said that removing black carbon may be counter-productive and lead to more warming.

BC has been a controversial topic in the international climate debate. While many Western nations have pushed for BC’s inclusion in the list of greenhouse gases under the United Nations’ Framework Convention on Climate Change,India has staunchly said no.

During the Cancun talks in December last year,former Environment Minister Jairam Ramesh had even declared: “We will resist any attempt to bring black carbon within the ambit of UNFCCC negotiations.”

The scientist—Associate Professor S K Satheesh of the Centre for Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences & Divecha Centre for Climate Change,IISc,Bangalore—said the removal of BC would mean the removal of other kinds of carbon (sulphate and organic) that act as coolants. This would thereby become more harmful for global warming’s cause,he said.

Subscriber Only Stories
UPSC Key- December 5, 2022: Why you should read ‘Iran’s morality police’ ...Premium
UPSC Essentials | Key terms of the past week with MCQsPremium
Amid Bengaluru gangrape investigation, lens on Rapido: how does the bike ...Premium
When Bhagat Singh got a pat from Bal Gangadhar TilakPremium

“Both sulphate and organic carbon are the scattering type,and they are cooling agents. So if you are removing a BC source,you reduce one unit of BC,but also 10 units of scattering aerosol. Then,in effect you are actually warming. Unless we have a technology to only remove the BC,not the others,” Satheesh told The Sunday Express . Satheesh is one of six scientists that formulated India’s Black Carbon Research Initiative as part of the National Carbonaceous Aerosols Programme (NCAP),launched by the MoEF a few months after Cancun. The initiative is headed by his senior colleague,Professor J Srinivasan.

Satheesh added that the very nature of carbon aerosols is important: “BC is 23 per cent absorbing and 77 per cent scattering,while organic carbons are 97 per cent scattering and 3 per cent absorbing,” he said,adding that the combined scattering is much larger than the combined absorption,thereby having cooling effects.

Satheesh said he has submitted papers regarding findings on BC to the Current Science journal and to a report being published by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Both have been accepted and would be published within a month,he added.


The scientist was delivering a lecture titled “Understanding the black carbon aerosol paradox” at the 77th annual meeting of the Indian Academy of Sciences hosted by the Physical Research Laboratory (PRL) in Ahmedabad,a wing of the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO),last week. In the abstract,Satheesh writes: “Of late,there is a tendency to project mitigation of BC aerosols as a quick solution to climate change. However,observations indicate that this may not hold good everywhere and at places,it has shown the opposite effect. This paradox of BC absorption and its climate impact over India needs careful investigation keeping its socio-economic and ecological conditions in perspective.”

First published on: 27-11-2011 at 01:15:34 am
Next Story

Yuvraj’s mother recounts how her son coped with fear of cancer

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments