Follow Us:
Thursday, May 26, 2022

Amartya Sen says Gujarat development model has weaknesses on social side

Sen says India's PM could not be someone who generates fear in a large minority population.

Written by ENS Economic Bureau | Mumbai |
July 26, 2013 3:30:19 am

Nobel Laureate Amartya Sen on Thursday said the Gujarat development model suffered from weaknesses on the social side and could not,therefore,be considered a success.

Sen,a strong advocate of government spending in health and education,was interacting with journalists of the Express Group at an Idea Exchange programme in Mumbai,which was also put on a video link with The Indian Express office in Delhi.

While conceding that there were things to be learnt from the Gujarat model as far as physical infrastructure was concerned,Sen said,“Gujarat is behind,particularly on the social side — lower educational pace,lower life expectancy,greater gender inequality,a busted healthcare system and that has not worked so well. What has been rather efficient in business has not been so efficient on things that we are trying to concentrate in India — to have a healthy educated labour force.”

Related: Ready to return Bharat Ratna if Vajpayee asks: Amartya Sen

Best of Express Premium

Explained: The message behind Margaret Atwood’s ‘unburnable&#...Premium
Welcome to the elusive world of crypto mining: Rohtak rig, 3 engineers, R...Premium
Explained: Sugar export curbs and their impactPremium
UPSC CSE Key – May 25, 2022: Know the Relevance of QUAD 2022 to Pangong T...Premium

Sen,who was honoured with the Bharat Ratna by Atal Bihari Vajpayee’s government in 1999,said India’s prime minister could not be someone who generates fear in a large minority population. “Hence I say Narendra Modi is not fit to be the PM.”

Sen,who has been the focus of a running controversy in the media,said he had been discovering things about himself on the current trip to India which he had not known earlier.

“I have read from the newspapers this morning that I have already declared myself pro-UPA,” he said. “With these discoveries,perhaps I need an introduction,” he said.

Sen said there was no case that subsidies should not be cut. However,he pointed out,the focus ought not to be on cutting only those subsidies that were linked to the poor,without touching those that benefited the rich — for instance on electricity,diesel and cooking gas.

“We do need to cut subsidy,but the idea that only subsidies for the poor should be cut and not those for the rich is not something that I support,” he said,adding that concerns about subsidies and fiscal responsibility should not be restricted only to the benefits that go to the poor.

Sen said he was in favour of the food security bill,but he would have liked it passed after a debate in Parliament. “I was upset that there was no parliamentary debate. It is a great pity it came in an ordinance,” he said.

For all the latest News Archive News, download Indian Express App.

  • Newsguard
  • The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
  • Newsguard