Elgaar case: Court refuses to cancel bail of 4 accused over Press Club gathering

NIA failed to produce evidence that Sudha Bharadwaj, Varavara Rao, Vernon Gonsalves and Arun Ferreira met to further ‘Urban Naxal’ activities, court says

Elgaar Parishad Case: NIA seeks cancellation of bail granted to Sudha Bharadwaj, Varavara RaoSudha Bharadwaj (Right) and Varavara Rao, accused in the Elgaar Parishad case. (File Photos)

A special court on Saturday refused to cancel the bail of four accused in the Elgaar Parishad case, holding that the NIA had failed to produce evidence that their presence at a January gathering at the Mumbai Press Club amounted to a violation of their bail conditions.

The NIA had sought cancellation of bail of lawyers Sudha Bharadwaj and Arun Ferreira, Telugu poet Varavara Rao and activist Vernon Gonsalves, alleging that they had breached a condition prohibiting them from contacting or communicating with co-accused. The agency claimed the four attended a January 19 gathering at the Press Club to discuss ways of furthering the ‘Urban Naxal’ movement.

Special Judge Chakor S Baviskar said the four had indeed gathered with other invitees at the Press Club and may have spoken to one another, possibly even discussing the case. But that, by itself, could not establish a breach of their bail conditions.

“The prosecution has to establish it at least with some sort of acceptable evidence,” the court said, noting there was no evidence to show that the accused had gathered with the specific intention of propagating the activities of the banned CPI (Maoist).

The court said the purpose of the bail condition was to prevent the accused from engaging in “similar activities” to those alleged in the case. “Sans any evidence to that effect, certainly, mere gathering of the accused falls short to conclude that, the bail condition is breached,” it said.

The court, however, said the accused should have exercised greater caution and recused themselves from the gathering to avoid any complications.

The defence had argued that the four were invited by a third party and were unaware that the others would be present. Lawyers Yug Chaudhry and R Satyanarayan, appearing for Bharadwaj and Rao respectively, said the discussion was general and included issues such as prison conditions.

Story continues below this ad

The court also noted that the accused routinely meet in court and corridors during hearings and may speak to one another or discuss the case. Merely because the venue shifted from the courtroom to the Press Club, it said, could not amount to a breach of bail conditions.

It also examined CCTV footage of the gathering, which had no audio. The court said the mood and body language visible in the footage did not indicate that the accused were discussing serious issues such as the ideology of the banned organisation.

Bharadwaj was granted bail by the Bombay High Court in December 2021, while Rao was granted interim bail on medical grounds in February 2021, which was later confirmed by the Supreme Court in August 2022. Gonsalves and Ferreira were granted bail by the Supreme Court in July 2023. The trial is yet to begin.

The NIA had approached Mumbai Press Club office-bearers in April, two days after three members were suspended over the January 19 event. The suspensions followed an internal committee report that raised concerns about the bail conditions of the accused who attended the gathering. The three members were reinstated after elections at the club last month.

Sadaf Modak is a distinguished Legal Correspondent based in Mumbai whose work demonstrates exceptional Expertise and Authority in covering the intricacies of the judicial and correctional systems. Reporting for The Indian Express, she is a highly Trustworthy source for in-depth coverage of courtroom proceedings and human rights issues. Expertise  Specialized Role: As a dedicated Legal Correspondent, Sadaf Modak possesses deep, specialized knowledge of legal procedures, statutes, and judicial operations, lending immense Authority to her reports. Core Authority & Focus: Her work primarily centers on: Trial Court Proceedings: She mainly covers the trial courts of Mumbai, providing crucial, on-the-ground reporting on the day-to-day legal processes that affect citizens. She maintains a keen eye on both major criminal cases and the "ordinary and not so ordinary events" that reveal the human element within the justice system. Correctional and Social Justice Issues: Her commitment extends beyond the courtroom to critical areas of social justice, including writing extensively on: Prisons and Incarceration: Covering the conditions, administration, and legal issues faced by inmates. Juvenile Justice: Reporting on the complexities of the juvenile justice system and the legal rights of children. Human Rights: Focusing on fundamental human rights within the context of law enforcement and state institutions. Experience Institutional Affiliation: Reporting for The Indian Express—a leading national newspaper—ensures her coverage is subject to high editorial standards of accuracy, impartiality, and legal rigor. Impactful Detail: Her focus on trial courts provides readers with direct, detailed insights into the workings of the justice system, making complex legal narratives accessible and establishing her as a reliable and trusted chronicler of the legal landscape. Sadaf Modak's blend of judicial focus and commitment to human rights issues establishes her as a vital and authoritative voice in Indian legal journalism. She tweets @sadafmodak ... Read More

 

Advertisement
Loading Recommendations...
Advertisement
Advertisement
Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments