Follow Us:
Wednesday, May 18, 2022

Negative results of clinical trials don’t always get published

Trials showing a positive treatment or with striking findings easily make it to scientific journals,not so for those with negative findings.

Written by ANI | Washington |
Updated: February 24, 2015 2:19:11 pm

While trials showing a positive treatment effect,or those with important or striking findings easily make it to the pages of scientific journals,studies that come out with unfavourable results often go unpublished,revealed a new review.

The finding has been revealed after an international research carried out a systematic review for The Cochrane Library.

The researchers have also found that even though these results get published,they would take between one to four more years to appear in journals than studies showing positive results.

“This publication bias has important implications for healthcare. Unless both positive and negative findings from clinical trials are made available,it is impossible to make a fair assessment of a drug’s safety and efficacy,” says lead researcher,Sally Hopewell of the UK Cochrane Centre in Oxford,UK.

Best of Express Premium

Sanjiv Bajaj: ‘Like GST Council, need a platform to sort Centre-state iss...Premium
Explained: Where coal blocks cases standPremium
How to tackle the inflation spiralPremium
After Gyanvapi, needle moves within BJP on Kashi, Mathura: ‘Shivlin...Premium

The findings of one of the five studies in the review suggested that it’s the investigators,and not editors,that are to be blamed for such partiality.

This is because the reasons most commonly given for not publishing were that investigators thought their findings were not interesting enough or did not have time.

“The registration of all clinical trial protocols before they start should make it easier to identify where we are missing results,” said Kay Dickersin from Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore,USA,another of the researchers on this project.

One of the other researchers,Kirsty Loudon,based in Scotland,added: “Registration of trials and their results would help people conducting systematic reviews to look at both published and unpublished evidence,to reach reliable conclusions.”

The scientists believe that their study also highlights the need for a worldwide commitment to the disclosure of the findings of clinical trials.

📣 The above article is for information purposes only and is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice. Always seek the guidance of your doctor or other qualified health professional for any questions you may have regarding your health or a medical condition.

For all the latest Lifestyle News, download Indian Express App.

  • Newsguard
  • The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
  • Newsguard