"India has a million kinds of diets," says Krish Ashok (Source: Freepik)
In a country where food is an extension of culture, community, and even caste, the question of “What do you eat?” is far more layered than a simple vegetarian vs non-vegetarian divide.
Now, thanks to a viral Instagram reel by Krish Ashok (@masalalab), a new set of playful yet insightful food identities has entered the public conversation. These terms are not just humorous labels; they point to the nuanced, sometimes inconsistent, but deeply personal choices Indians make when it comes to food. “India has a million kinds of diets. And we take them seriously. What type are you?” he captioned the post.
The reel humorously highlights India’s quirky food identities:
Ashok’s reel has sparked both laughter and reflection online, offering a mirror to our modern eating habits. One user joked: “I snack a lot. Guess that makes me a munchitarian.” Another wrote, “This is probably your most factually incorrect (by intent) yet most amusing reel.”
These different categories hint at how flexible — or contradictory — our food identities have become.
View this post on Instagram
Kanikka Malhotra, consultant dietician and certified diabetes educator, explains, “These are the words of a transition from strict dietary dualisms to situational choices, with people weighing heritage (e.g., home-based vegetarianism) against globalised lives (e.g., experimenting with non-vegetarian food socially), and much more variations of following diets.”
They represent changing habits — maintaining ritual purity at home, being flexible outside, or simply changing personal preferences based on mood, festivities or situations.
Flexible labels minimise guilt/pride dichotomies by redefining decisions as personal, not moral, notes Malhotra. She adds, “For example, festitarians (avoiding non-veg during festivals) preserve cultural connections without permanent constraint, allowing guilt-free flexibility. Identity conflicts can occur, though, if families view deviations as cultural loss, requiring open discussions regarding changing food norms.”