Why Kerala consumer forum ordered Byju’s to refund Rs 8.5 lakh and pay Rs 1 lakh compensation

The district consumer disputes redressal commission, Thiruvananthapuram held Byju's liable for deficiency in service and unfair trade practice.

Consumer forum ordered Byjus to refund Rs 8.5 lakh and pay Rs 1 lakh compensation.Consumer forum ordered Byjus to refund Rs 8.5 lakh and pay Rs 1 lakh compensation. (Image generated using AI)

In a case arising from the cancellation of an online coaching course and a subsequent alleged bank fraud during the refund process, the district consumer disputes redressal commission, Thiruvananthapuram, recently directed edtech company Byju’s to refund Rs 8.5 lakh and pay Rs 1 lakh compensation for deficiency in service and unfair trade practice.

A bench comprising president P V Jayarajan and members Preetha G Nair and Viju V R passed the order in a complaint filed by a teacher on behalf of her son.

“As the mental agony and financial loss to the complainant was caused due to the deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the part of the opposite party, we find that the opposite party is liable to compensate the loss sustained by the complainant,” the consumer forum said while allowing the complaint.

Background

  • The complainant had alleged that his son, who was studying in Class IX, had enrolled in Byju’s online course.
  • After a meeting of the company representative and the complainant, he paid an amount of Rs 20,000 as a spot registration fee. However, the very next day, the complainant decided to cancel the course as his son wished to pursue offline classes and requested a refund through email.
  • It was alleged that the complainant sent several e-mails to cancel the course, however there was no reply to the mails or phone calls.
  • Subsequently, the complainant allegedly received a call from Byju’s Bengaluru office, during which he was instructed to download a remote access application and share his bank details for processing the refund.
  • Later, an amount of Rs 8 lakh was unexpectedly credited to the complainant’s bank account, following which several unauthorised transactions were carried out, resulting in a debit of approximately Rs 8.32 lakh.
  • Realising that a fraud had occurred, the complainant informed his bank, approached the RBI Ombudsman, and lodged a complaint with the cyber cell, leading to registration of an FIR.

Findings

  • In spite of sending a number of emails, the opposite party did not even care to reply to any of those email communications sent by the opposite party.
  • There is no contra evidence from the side of the opposite party to discredit the evidence adduced by the complainant and hence the evidence adduced by the complainant stands unchallenged.
  • In the absence of any contra evidence from the side of the opposite party we accept the evidence adduced by the complainant.
  • There is deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the part of the opposite party. It is also evident from the evidence adduced by the complainant that the complainant has suffered mental agony and financial loss due to the act of the opposite party.
  • As the mental agony and financial loss to the complainant was caused due to the deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the part of the opposite party, we find that the opposite party is liable to compensate the loss sustained by the complainant.

Directions

  • The opposite party is directed to refund a sum of Rs 8.52 lakh along with Rs 1 lakh as compensation and Rs 3,000 being the cost of this proceedings to the complainant within 30 days.

Ashish Shaji is a Senior Sub-Editor at The Indian Express, where he specializes in legal journalism. Combining a formal education in law with years of editorial experience, Ashish provides authoritative coverage and nuanced analysis of court developments and landmark judicial decisions for a national audience. Expertise Legal Core Competency: Ashish is a law graduate (BA LLB) from IME Law College, CCSU. This academic foundation allows him to move beyond surface-level reporting, offering readers a deep-dive into the technicalities of statutes, case law, and legal precedents. Specialized Legal Reporting: His work at The Indian Express focuses on translating the often-dense proceedings of India's top courts into clear, actionable news. His expertise includes: Judicial Analysis: Breaking down complex orders from the Supreme Court and various High Courts. Legal Developments: Monitoring legislative changes and their practical implications for the public and the legal fraternity. Industry Experience: With over 5 years in the field, Ashish has contributed to several niche legal and professional platforms, honing his ability to communicate complex information. His previous experience includes: Lawsikho: Gaining insights into legal education and practical law. Verdictum: Focusing on high-quality legal news and court updates. Enterslice: Working at the intersection of legal, financial, and advisory services. ... Read More

 

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement