Premium

‘With knowledge but without intention’: Telangana HC reverses murder verdict of man who killed wife while drunk

The Telangana High Court says the primary point of consideration for the court in matters relating to murder is the intent and purpose of the accused.

A division bench of Justice K Lakshman and Justice Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy opined that “it was a case where an act was committed by the accused with knowledge but without intention”. (Source: File Photo)A division bench of Justice K Lakshman and Justice Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy opined that “it was a case where an act was committed by the accused with knowledge but without intention”. (Source: File Photo)

The Telangana High Court on Monday overturned the life sentence of a man who killed his wife in a drunken dispute, ruling that the act lacked premeditated intent. The decision resulted in Dharavat Bhav Singh being released after serving approximately six years in prison.

A division bench of Justices K Lakshman and Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy modified the original sentence of life imprisonment to the jail time already served, citing the legal distinction between “knowledge” and “intention”. The bench opined that “it was a case where an act was committed by the accused with knowledge but without intention”.

Singh was convicted by the trial court for the homicidal death of his wife and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment. Married for twelve years, the couple had two children, but the relationship was strained due to Singh’s alcohol addiction and habitual harassment. On April 6, 2018, during a sudden quarrel while having meals at their home in Jinkala Thanda village of Raghunathapalem mandal in Khammam district, Singh struck his wife on the forehead with a pestle, causing fatal head injuries. The trial court recorded that the incident occurred when he was under the influence of alcohol.

‘Intoxication no excuse, but presence or absence of intent relevant’
In its judgment, the bench noted, “While intoxication does not excuse the act, it is relevant to determine presence or absence of intention.” Further, the bench felt that the accused acted in “a fit of anger” and that the death resulted from “the assault rather than any calculated act”. The bench also noted there was “no evidence of premeditation or any deliberate plan” to kill the woman.

“The incident appears to have occurred in the heat of the moment, during a sudden quarrel between the accused and the deceased. Using pestle indicates the assault occurred impulsively, without preparation or selection of a deadly weapon beforehand. Although a pestle is capable of causing fatal injuries, it is not a weapon ordinarily associated with intentional homicide,” the judgment stated.

The court emphasised the thin legal distinction between “intent” and “knowledge” under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) while noting that the primary point of consideration for the court in matters relating to murder is the intent and purpose of the accused. It determined that Singh knew that his acts were likely to cause death, whereas the evidence would not show that there was any intention to cause death.

‘Murder committed without premeditation’
Referring to various Supreme Court judgments, the bench held that the offence was committed without any premeditation. “It would be unsafe to treat ‘intent’ and ‘knowledge’ in equal terms. They are not different things. Knowledge would be one of the circumstances to be taken into consideration while determining or inferring the requisite intent.”

Story continues below this ad

Upholding the trial court’s finding Singh guilty of the offence, the bench concluded that the conviction under charges of murder (IPC section 302) was unsustainable and altered it to culpable homicide not amounting to murder (IPC section 304 part II).

The court thus sentenced Singh, who had been incarcerated since September 2018 till being released on bail in early 2024, the to period he had already served in jail. His bail bonds were subsequently discharged.

Rahul V Pisharody is Assistant Editor with the Indian Express Online and has been reporting for IE on various news developments from Telangana since 2019. He is currently reporting on legal matters from the Telangana High Court. Rahul started his career as a journalist in 2011 with The New Indian Express and worked in different roles at the Hyderabad bureau for over 8 years. As Deputy Metro Editor, he was in charge of the Hyderabad bureau of the newspaper and coordinated with the team of city reporters, district correspondents, other centres and internet desk for over three years. A native of Palakkad in Kerala, Rahul has a Master's degree in Communication (Print and New Media) from the University of Hyderabad and a Bachelor's degree in Business Management from PSG College of Arts and Science, Coimbatore. ... Read More

 

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement