‘Who are you to question policy?’: Supreme Court on jobs for Tamil Nadu stampede victims

The Madras High Court struck down the Tamil Nadu Government’s decision to give jobs to the families of the 41 victims of the Karur stampede.

Rally of Tamil Nadu CM and Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam president Vijay in Namakkal district, Tamil Nadu, September, 2025. (PTI Photo)Rally of Tamil Nadu CM and Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam president Vijay in Namakkal district, Tamil Nadu, September, 2025. (PTI Photo)

The Supreme Court Friday stayed the Madras High Court order striking down Tamil Nadu’s decision to provide government jobs to families of the 41 victims of last year’s Karur stampede, questioning why the state should be prevented from offering employment to those who have lost their sole breadwinner.

“A stampede took place; something very unfortunate happened; some hundreds of people died. Now if the government decided that the family members should be provided with some succour, and suppose they would have decided to compensate them with money, would you have objected?” Justice J B Pardiwala told the counsel for the original petitioner who had filed the PIL before the high court.

“Who are you to question the policy of the government, saying no employment should be given? Suppose the sole earning member has died in the stampede and there is nobody else in the family who is earning, shouldn’t the government give some employment to the son or daughter or wife as per their educational [qualification]?” the judge added.

Justice Pardiwala was presiding over a two-judge bench.

‘Don’t bring politics here’

Representing Tamil Nadu, Senior Advocate A M Singhvi wondered how the High Court could interfere if the state government wanted to grant compassionate appointments to the victims’ families as a policy decision under Article 162.

The counsel representing a respondent said there is a conflict of interest in Tamil Nadu’s decision, as the political party allegedly under scrutiny for the stampede is ruling the state.

To his submission that he was representing a political party, Justice K Vinod Chandran remarked, “Don’t bring politics here”.

What Madras High Court said

Story continues below this ad

On July 27, the Madras High Court struck down the Tamil Nadu Government’s decision to give jobs to the families of the 41 victims, holding that it violated Articles 14 and 16, which guarantee equality before law and equal opportunity in public employment.

The court said the state could not use its executive powers under Article 162 to bypass these constitutional limits. “If executive action were to be left unfettered and given free hand, chaos will reign,” it said.

The court also noted that compassionate appointments are governed by established rules and waiting lists, and granting jobs outside this framework would be unfair to families already awaiting consideration. It also warned that such appointments could trigger similar demands after other accidents.

Instead, the court suggested that the government support the affected families through technical education, entrepreneurship, and skill development, saying this could help create “leaders, entrepreneurs, self-sufficient individuals.”

Story continues below this ad

The stampede, which killed 41 people during a TVK rally last year, is being investigated by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) following a Supreme Court order in October 2025.

Ananthakrishnan G. is a Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express. He has been in the field for over 26 years, kicking off his journalism career as a freelancer in the late nineties with bylines in The Hindu. A graduate in law, he practised in the District judiciary in Kerala for about two years before switching to journalism. His first permanent assignment was with The Press Trust of India in Delhi where he was assigned to cover the lower courts and various commissions of inquiry. He reported from the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court of India during his first stint with The Indian Express in 2005-2006. Currently, in his second stint with the daily newspaper, he reports from the Supreme Court and writes on topics related to law and the administration of justice. Legal reporting is his forte though he has extensive experience in political and community reporting too, having spent a decade as Kerala state correspondent, The Times of India and The Telegraph. He is a stickler for facts and has several impactful stories to his credit. ... Read More

 

Advertisement
Loading Recommendations...
Advertisement
Advertisement
Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments