Premium

‘What is wrong with that?’: Supreme Court stays Kerala HC order stopping LDF govt’s Nava Kerala survey

The ‘Nava Kerala Citizens Response Programme’ has been criticised as an attempt by the Pinarayi Vijayan government to carry out a political campaign at the expense of the exchequer.

Nava Kerala Mission March Express Archive PictureWith the Kerala Assembly elections due in a few months, the programme had come under a cloud as critics alleged that it was an attempt to carry out a political campaign at the expense of the exchequer. (Express Archive)

The Supreme Court on Tuesday stayed a Kerala High Court order that stopped the state’s ruling Left Democratic Front (LDF) government from going ahead with its controversial Rs 20 crore ‘Nava Kerala Citizens Response Programme’, with Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant asking what was wrong if a state government wanted to find out how its schemes had worked.

The ‘Nava Kerala Citizens Response Programme’ was touted as a “welfare study intended to obtain development suggestions and ideas from the people”.

Issuing notice on the state government’s appeal against the February 17 high court ruling that termed the Pinarayi Vijayan government’s decision as a “colourable exercise of executive power”, a two-judge bench presided by the CJI said that the high court order shall, in the meanwhile, remain stayed. The bench comprising Justice Joymalya Bagchi also asked the state to submit a report of the expenditure incurred for the work “at an appropriate stage”.

Taking up the appeal, the CJI asked, “If a state government spends hundreds of crores of rupees on welfare schemes, and eventually…wants to know through an evaluation that have my schemes worked or not…Assuming that elections are there, they want to go before the people that look here, though we have been spending so much on welfare schemes, but we have ultimately found we are at fault at so and so places, we would like to improve, what is wrong with that?”

With the Kerala Assembly elections due in a few months, the programme had come under a cloud as critics alleged that it was an attempt to carry out a political campaign at the expense of the exchequer.

The counsel appearing for the original petitioner said, “The wrong is the government can go, not the party, through the volunteers…The whole ploy is they send party workers to each house.”

He referred to a letter issued by CPI(M) Kerala state secretary M V Govindan on September 23, 2025, more than two weeks before the state cabinet announced the programme on October 10, 2025. The letter asked party cadres “to flood” the ‘Samoohya Sannadha Sena Portal’, from which the volunteers for the Nava Kerala programme were subsequently drawn. The portal was created in 2020 for the specific purpose of forming a social volunteer force to provide assistance in natural disasters in the state and to help in any local crisis.

Story continues below this ad

The high court bench of Chief Justice Soumen Sen and Syam Kumar V M had sought an explanation from Govindan on allegations that there was “inside knowledge” of the programme, passed on to the party.

The party secretary filed a counter-affidavit, which the high court said was “sketchy” and “intentionally overlooked or evasively denied…the veracity and authenticity of the contents of the documents, preceding the announcement of the scheme”.

The high court said the “contentions put forth by the petitioners based on…letter issued by the…party secretary cannot be totally brushed aside. The evasive and non-responsive counter-affidavit” filed by him, “without any tenable explanation as to how the…letter came to be issued to its cadres, much before” the government “order or even before the cabinet decision approving the Nava Keralam Programme on 08.10.2025 gives credence to the allegation that there has been a concerted effort to covertly use the said programme by enabling the party cadres to flood the portal while not giving adequate publicity to the fact that the portal, though created for a different purpose and requiring a different commitment would be used for the Nava Keralam Programme.”

The high court also concluded that “the expenditure incurred in implementation of such programme is in violation of the rules of business” and “the said amount neither could have been allocated nor utilised under the special PR campaign head being not permitted under the rules of business.”

 

Advertisement
Loading Recommendations...
Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments