3 min readNew DelhiUpdated: Aug 18, 2026 04:21 AM IST
Stating that states cannot block the elephant corridors fearing crop damage, the Supreme Court Monday asked the Centre to conduct a fresh survey of these corridors across the country.
A three-judge bench, presided by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, said, “We are very clear that there cannot be obstacles in the way of wildlife. Elephant herds have a practice of travelling long distances. No State can say that just because crops are getting destroyed, there have to be obstacles in their path”.
The bench, also comprising Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Justice V Mohana, was hearing an application which highlighted blockade of the corridors in some states.
Story continues below this ad
“We have been informed that there are mandatory guidelines issued by the Ministry of Environment, Forest, Climate Change and Wildlife to ensure seamless and unobstructed elephant corridors passing through different States. However, owing to certain local factors, the elephant corridors have been impeded, choked, blocked, or obstructed…”, the bench said in its order directing a fresh survey.
The top court also asked the Centre to submit a comprehensive survey report detailing the necessary steps and initiatives taken by them to prevent such obstructions.
The counsel for applicant pointed out that fireballs are thrown, mashaals used and aggressive groups known as “Hulla parties” are formed to scare the pachyderms. The counsel also pointed to rising instances of human-animal conflict in West Bengal.
Justice Bagchi said, “There is a pathway from Nepal and the northern hills of North Bengal through which herds of elephants move into Odisha and Chhattisgarh. Now, Odisha and Chhattisgarh have constructed walls to prevent the elephants from entering.”
Story continues below this ad
The court directed that status report be filed addressing the issue of use of firearms or other coercive action against the animals.
The CJI pointed out that the Union Environment Ministry has an expert body and asked what they are recommending. He said the guidelines laid down by them are not mere words but are ought to be followed. “Which State is non-compliant, and why are they not complying? Have you undertaken any such study?” the CJI asked Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati, who appeared for the Centre. Bhati submitted, “In 2023, we carried out an inspection and filed a status report. We can execute a fresh exercise.”
The court said the matter will be heard after six weeks.