“Fees are paid for services to be rendered by way of imparting education by the educational institutions. If there is no rendering of service, the question of payment of fee would not arise. A request for refund was made within a few days, well before commencement of the academic year in June. The school had ample time to fill up the seats which had fallen vacant,” the August 19 order read.
Sought to cancel admission within 6 days
The man approached the school on February 9, 2019, to enrol his daughter for the 2018-19 academic year. The school offered him a fee discount if he paid before February 10. He accordingly paid Rs 21,000 towards the annual fee and completed the admission formalities.
However, on February 14, he informed the school that his move to Secunderabad had been postponed, and sought cancellation of the admission and a refund. The school, however, allegedly replied that the fee once paid is not refundable, nor transferable, nor adjustable.
Aggrieved, he moved the commission seeking a refund and compensation of Rs 20,000 from the school. The man was represented by advocate G M Mohiuddin.
‘Blatant act’
The commission noted that the school did not file a written version before it. It also mentioned that the student who leaves in between or mid-session or after attending for a few days or months should be denied a refund of the fee for the remaining period, which they did not attend.
Story continues below this ad
However, the commission said that the existing practice in many institutions of collecting advance payment and not refunding it should be done away with. “Such blatant acts of the opposite parties (school) are a clear example of unfair trade practice,” it stated.
Pointing out that schools are doubly enriching themselves by admitting another candidate without refunding the fees of a student who has withdrawn admission, the commission said, “Such institutes have become commercial shops, and there cannot be any worse form of unscrupulous and unfair trade practice in the field of education.”
Accordingly, it directed the school to refund the sum of Rs 21,000 along with compensation of Rs 10,000 towards mental agony and physical trauma caused to the complainant. The commission also directed the school to pay Rs 5,000 towards costs of the litigation within 45 days.
Takeaway
The ruling highlights that a school cannot automatically retain admission fees by simply labelling them “non-refundable” when a student withdraws before classes begin, and no educational services have been provided.
Story continues below this ad
Aggrieved consumers may contact the consumer helpline in their respective states (Telangana: 0771-2582902) or call the National Consumer Helpline at 1915 for assistance.
Don’t miss out on these stories:
Denied fee refund after daughter quit Indian school in 4 days, dad wins Rs 63,000
Theatre played 22 minutes of ads before starting movie, ordered to pay Rs 75,000
Denied knee-replacement claim based on X-ray, man wins Rs 1.8 lakh from insurer
