‘Adequate sanitation facilities a basic human right under Article 21′: HC directs BMC to provide sufficient toilets in Mumbai slums
The HC held that the BMC, particularly when the land in question belongs to it, is duty-bound to provide an adequate number of toilets and maintain them “so that the hygiene and health of the slum dwellers is looked after”. The court added that this obligation applies to all slums in Mumbai.
Observing that access to adequate sanitation is a basic human right under Article 21 (Right to Life) of the Constitution, the Bombay High Court has directed the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) to ensure sufficient toilet facilities in slum areas across Mumbai, including those situated on encroached municipal or government land.
“In our opinion, making adequate provisions for toilets / sanitation facilities concerns the basic human rights under Article 21 of the Constitution, this notwithstanding the fact that the area in question is a slum created by encroachment on the land belonging to the municipal corporation,” the court said.
The HC held that the BMC, particularly when the land in question belongs to it, is duty-bound to provide an adequate number of toilets and maintain them “so that the hygiene and health of the slum dwellers is looked after”. The court added that this obligation applies to all slums in Mumbai.
The court passed the order on February 3 while hearing a writ petition filed by Chetan Samajik Pratishthan, which raised concerns over the lack of sanitation facilities in slum areas of Govandi in Mumbai’s eastern suburbs. The slum cluster, spread over nearly 1.83 lakh square metres, houses around 4,270 residents in over 800 huts.
Advocate Pradeep Thorat, appearing for the petitioner, submitted that the slums of Buddha Nagar, Bhaiyasaheb Nagar and New Lumbini Baug had only 60 toilet blocks, most of which were in a ruinous and dilapidated condition. He added that if any of these were demolished and rebuilt elsewhere, residents would be forced to walk long distances to meet basic sanitation needs.
A bench of Justices Girish S Kulkarni and Aarti A Sathe observed that the “meagre 60 toilets” were “insufficient” for a “large population” of over 4,000 persons. The court also noted that under municipal law, the civic body cannot neglect basic human needs such as adequate sanitation and toilet facilities.
“The Municipal Commissioner and officers below him cannot neglect and / or breach such basic rights of the citizens, who are living in unhygienic conditions in the slums that too, proliferated on the municipal and Government lands,” the bench said.
Story continues below this ad
While noting that current state policies tend to “reward” encroachers who occupy public land before cut-off dates by granting free permanent alternate accommodation (PAA) or subsidised tenements, the court observed that such land is often made available for “commercial exploitation”.
The HC pointed out that these PAAs are “constructed by private developers” as a “business venture undertaken for profit”, which occurs “at the cost of the public exchequer and results in monumental and irreversible loss of public land” that could otherwise be used for gardens, playgrounds and other public amenities.
However, the court said that in the absence of any alternative policy, the failure of the BMC or the state to provide toilets in slum areas would amount to a “breach of the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution”.
The HC further said municipal officers must also cater to other health and hygiene requirements in slum areas to prevent the spread of disease and infection. This duty includes providing clean drinking water and medical assistance through clinics and dispensaries.
Story continues below this ad
“Such measures also constitute an entitlement of the slum dwellers to a disease-free and healthy life, which is a concomitant of Article 21 of the Constitution,” the court noted.
The bench directed the BMC to immediately repair and ensure daily maintenance of existing toilets, and to identify open areas to construct additional toilet blocks in proportion to the population within two months. It also said the Assistant Municipal Commissioner concerned must personally oversee the upkeep of toilet blocks in slum areas across Mumbai.
“This would be the basic municipal duty of the municipal corporation,” the HC said, while disposing of the petition.
Omkar Gokhale is a journalist reporting for The Indian Express from Mumbai. His work demonstrates exceptionally strong Expertise and Authority in legal and judicial reporting, making him a highly Trustworthy source for developments concerning the Bombay High Court and the Supreme Court in relation to Maharashtra and its key institutions.
Expertise & Authority
Affiliation: Reports for The Indian Express, a national newspaper known for its rigorous journalistic standards, lending significant Trustworthiness to his legal coverage.
Core Authority & Specialization: Omkar Gokhale's work is almost exclusively dedicated to the complex field of legal affairs and jurisprudence, specializing in:
Bombay High Court Coverage: He provides detailed, real-time reports on the orders, observations, and decisions of the Bombay High Court's principal and regional benches. Key subjects include:
Fundamental Rights & Environment: Cases on air pollution, the right to life of residents affected by dumping sites, and judicial intervention on critical infrastructure (e.g., Ghodbunder Road potholes).
Civil & Criminal Law: Reporting on significant bail orders (e.g., Elgaar Parishad case), compensation for rail-related deaths, and disputes involving high-profile individuals (e.g., Raj Kundra and Shilpa Shetty).
Constitutional and Supreme Court Matters: Reports and analysis on key legal principles and Supreme Court warnings concerning Maharashtra, such as those related to local body elections, reservations, and the creamy layer verdict.
Governance and Institution Oversight: Covers court rulings impacting public bodies like the BMC (regularisation of illegal structures) and the State Election Commission (postponement of polls), showcasing a focus on judicial accountability.
Legal Interpretation: Reports on public speeches and observations by prominent judicial figures (e.g., former Chief Justice B. R. Gavai) on topics like free speech, gender equality, and institutional challenges.
Omkar Gokhale's consistent, focused reporting on the judiciary establishes him as a definitive and authoritative voice for legal developments originating from Mumbai and impacting the entire state of Maharashtra. ... Read More