Punjab man ‘loses’ vision in one eye after 2 surgeries, gets Rs 2.33 lakh payout

The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Ropar observed that the hospital had failed to produce any documentary proof of informed consent warning to the patient of the high failure rate and risk of complete vision loss.

consumer court case surgeriesThe complainant alleged that he lost vision in one eye after surgery. (Image generated using AI)

A district consumer commission in Punjab has directed two hospitals to jointly pay Rs 2.33 lakh to an 85-year-old man after holding them liable for medical negligence that allegedly resulted in the loss of vision in his left eye following two surgeries.

President Kuljit Pal Singh and member Ranvir Kaur found that neither hospital had produced sufficient evidence that the complainant had been properly informed of the risks and complications associated with the surgeries.

“There is a complete loss of the vision of left eye of the complainant and presently he is under treatment…Hence, it is a clear cut medical negligence on the part of the OPs,” the commission observed.

Two surgeries and loss of vision

According to the complainant, he had visited a hospital for medical treatment after he had suffered low vision in his left eye. He alleged that after undergoing surgery, he experienced severe pain and persistent watering in the operated eye. Despite repeated visits, he claimed he was merely told it was post-operative pain before being referred to another hospital. It was stated that another surgery was performed on his eye.

He later sought treatment at a different hospital, where doctors allegedly informed him that his left eye had shrunk and that vision could not be restored. Alleging gross medical negligence, the complainant moved the consumer commission.

Both the hospitals denied negligence and deficiency in service and argued that the complainant developed a post-operative infection due to factors such as his compromised corneal condition or failure to properly use prescribed medication and maintain hygiene. It was claimed that the surgery was successful and the complainant did not return for the follow-up treatment.

The commission observed that the hospital had failed to produce any documentary proof of informed consent warning to the patient of the high failure rate and risk of complete vision loss associated with the surgery. The commission held that the complainant was not properly informed regarding the side effect/complications of the post-operative surgery.

Story continues below this ad

It observed that while one consent form was placed on record, it was in English and could not be presumed to have been understood by an 85-year-old rural patient. The commission further held that referring the patient from the first hospital to the private hospital for a second surgery amounted to an unfair trade practice.

Holding that it could not escape liability for procedures performed within its premises and noting the complainant had completely lost vision in his left eye, the commission concluded that there was clear medical negligence on the part of both hospitals and granted relief to the complainant.

The commission directed the hospitals to refund Rs 33,000 collected towards treatment and surgeries, besides paying Rs 2 lakh as compensation and litigation expenses.

Takeaway

Hospitals must ensure that patients give informed consent after fully understanding the risks and possible complications of a procedure, particularly when they are elderly or do not understand the language of the consent form.

Story continues below this ad

For consumer-related grievances, individuals may contact the consumer helpline in their respective states and Union territories (Punjab: 0800-22577) or call the National Consumer Helpline at 1915 for assistance.

Ashish Shaji is a Senior Sub-Editor at The Indian Express (Digital), where he specialises in legal journalism. Combining a formal education in law with years of editorial experience, Ashish covers court developments and key cases for the audience. Expertise Ashish is a law graduate (BA LLB) from IME Law College, CCSU. His work at The Indian Express focuses on translating the often-dense proceedings of courts into clear, legal content. He also runs liveblogs from the Supreme Court and various High Courts. Industry Experience: With over 5 years in the field, Ashish has contributed to several niche legal and professional platforms, honing his ability to communicate complex information. His previous experience includes: Lawsikho: Gaining insights into legal education and practical law. Verdictum: Focusing on high-quality legal news and court updates. Enterslice: Working at the intersection of legal, financial, and advisory services. ... Read More

 

Advertisement
Loading Recommendations...
Advertisement
Advertisement
Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments