Premium

Punjab and Haryana HC clears way for ex-Haryana CM Bhupinder Hooda’s trial in Manesar land case

Former Haryana chief minister Bhupinder Singh Hooda fails to stop framing of charges despite stay on co-accused; court says he accepted 2020 order and cannot now delay proceedings.

Punjab and Haryana HC clears way for ex-Haryana CM Bhupinder Hooda’s trial in Manesar land caseIn his high court petition, Hooda argued that “charges cannot be framed against him alone as all of them are accused of conspiracy on the same set of allegations.” (File Photo)

The Punjab and Haryana High Court Friday dismissed a plea by former Haryana chief minister Bhupinder Singh Hooda to postpone his trial in a decade-old corruption case linked to the release of land in Manesar, Gurugram, paving the way for formal charges to be framed against him.

Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya rejected Hooda’s argument that the trial could not proceed because the Supreme Court had stayed proceedings against several co-accused in the same conspiracy case. The court noted that Hooda had never challenged a 2020 trial court order refusing to discharge him, and, therefore, could not now use the stay granted to others as a reason to halt his own case.

The case stems from a First Information Report (FIR) registered in August 2015 at Manesar police station, accusing Hooda and senior officials of deliberately letting land acquisition proceedings lapse. The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) took over the probe within days and filed a chargesheet in December 2018, alleging cheating, criminal conspiracy, and misuse of official position under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

The allegations claim that landowners were forced to sell their holdings in panic under threat of government acquisition for public purposes. After the acquisition was abandoned, permissions for change of land use were allegedly granted to private builders, causing loss to the state and farmers while benefiting the accused.

In December 2020, a special CBI court in Panchkula rejected discharge applications, including Hooda’s, and directed that charges be framed. While several co-accused challenged this order in the high court and later the Supreme Court, securing stays, Hooda did not. The high court dismissed those challenges in May 2025, but the Supreme Court stayed the trial for the petitioners between May and September 2025.

Hooda then moved the trial court in September 2025, seeking a postponement on the ground that all the accused faced the same conspiracy charge and the evidence was common. The trial court rejected this on September 19, fixing October 30 for framing charges against Hooda and others not covered by the Supreme Court stay.

In his high court petition, Hooda argued that “charges cannot be framed against him alone as all of them are accused of conspiracy on the same set of allegations.” His lawyers also invoked the trial court’s power to adjourn hearings for valid reasons.

Story continues below this ad

The high court disagreed. “The contention… that in the absence of co-conspirators, as trial qua them has been stayed, the petitioner cannot be charged for conspiracy, is without substance,” Justice Dahiya wrote.

He further said, “It is because the petitioner himself has not challenged the order, dated 01.12.2020, declining his application for discharge. It has attained finality qua him, leaving no option with the trial Court but to frame the charge.”

The judge added that Hooda “cannot be permitted to impede the obvious outcome of that order by alluding to an interim order of stay granted in favour of the co-accused.” The court said charges could still be framed and evidence recorded against Hooda even if the co-accused were absent, as he faced other offences beyond conspiracy.

The CBI counsel argued that postponing the trial would violate Supreme Court directions in a 2018 judgment that led to the FIR, and cited a 2001 Supreme Court ruling barring stays in corruption cases.

Story continues below this ad

The high court quoted the 2001 verdict: “Thus in cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act, there can be no stay of trials… merely because the concerned Court is not in a position to take up the petition for hearing would be no ground for staying the trial even temporarily.”

Hooda was represented by Senior Advocates R S Cheema and Pardeep Singh Poonia. The CBI was represented by Advocate Ravi Kamal Gupta.

Manraj Grewal Sharma is a senior journalist and the Resident Editor of The Indian Express in Chandigarh, where she leads the newspaper’s coverage of north India’s most politically and institutionally significant regions. From Punjab and Haryana to Himachal Pradesh and the Union Territory of Chandigarh, she oversees reporting at the intersection of governance, law, politics and society. She also reports on the diaspora, especially in Canada and the US. With a career spanning journalism across several countries, academia and international development, Manraj brings a rare depth of perspective to regional reporting. She is widely regarded as a leading chronicler of Punjab’s contemporary history and socio-political evolution, particularly its long shadow of militancy, federal tensions and identity politics. Her book, Dreams after Darkness, remains a definitive account of the militancy years and their enduring aftermath. Professional Background & Expertise A gold medalist in mass communication and a post-graduate in English literature, Manraj has a multifaceted career spanning journalism, academia, and international development. She was also awarded a fellowship by National Foundation of India and did several in-depth pieces on Manipur. Internationally, she has reported from Israel, US, UK, Myanmar, and Mauritius Her key focus areas include: Regional Politics, History, Agriculture, Diaspora, and Security. Of late, she has started focusing on Legal & Judicial Affairs: Much of her recent work involves reporting on high-stakes cases in the Punjab and Haryana High Court, ranging from environmental policy to civil rights. International Consulting: She previously served as a consulting editor for the Asia Pacific Adaptation Network and a publishing consultant for the Asian Development Bank (ADB) in Manila. Academia: For five years, she was the managing editor of Gender, Technology and Development, a peer-reviewed international journal at the Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok. Recent Notable Articles (Late 2025) Her recent reportage focuses heavily on judicial interventions and regional governance: 1. Environment & Governance "‘NGT can’t test legality of policy’: HC hears challenge to Punjab’s ‘Green Habitat’ plan" (Dec 22, 2025): Covering a critical legal battle over whether the National Green Tribunal has the authority to strike down a state policy regularizing farmhouses on delisted forest land. "High court pulls up Punjab poll panel over audio clip probe" (Dec 10, 2025): Reporting on judicial concerns regarding the transparency and fairness of local body elections. 2. Legal Rights & Social Welfare "HC issues notice to Punjab, Haryana over delay in building old age homes" (Dec 22, 2025): Reporting on a contempt petition against top officials for failing to establish government-run homes for the elderly as promised in 2019. "Victims can appeal acquittals in sessions court without seeking special leave" (Dec 19, 2025): Highlighting a significant procedural shift in criminal law following a Supreme Court ruling. "HC upholds benefits for Punjab FCI officer acquitted in 20-year-old bribery case" (Dec 19, 2025): A report on the concept of "honourable acquittal" and its impact on employee benefits. 3. Human Rights & Identity "As Punjab denies parole to MP Amritpal Singh, HC asks it to submit ‘foundational material’" (Dec 1, 2025): Covering the legal proceedings regarding the radical preacher and sitting MP's request to attend Parliament. "Protecting life paramount: HC backs Muslim woman in live-in after verbal divorce" (Nov 6, 2025): Analyzing judicial protections for personal liberty in the context of traditional practices. Signature Beats Manraj is recognized for her ability to decode complex judicial rulings and relate them to the everyday lives of citizens. Whether it is a 30-year-old land battle in Fazilka or the political implications of Kangana Ranaut’s candidacy in Mandi, her writing provides deep historical and regional context. Contact @grewal_sharma on X manrajgrewalsharma on Instagram ... Read More

 

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement