Premium

‘Protecting life paramount’: HC backs Muslim woman in live-in after verbal divorce 

Court directs Amritsar Police to probe threat after woman leaves husband, two kids following a  verbal divorce and starts living with a  new partner.

Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi ruled that live-in relationships, though socially debated, are legally valid and protected under the Constitution.The Punjab & Haryana High Court directed police to protect a live-in couple facing threats, saying they have the right to life and liberty. (Representative image)

The Punjab and Haryana High Court on Thursday directed the Amritsar Police Commissioner to assess and act on any threat to a live-in couple, including a Muslim woman who says she was given a verbal divorce by her husband before entering a new relationship.

Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi, while disposing of a criminal writ petition (CRWP-11897-2025), held that even if the petitioners “are living in a live-in relationship, they are entitled to the protection of their life and liberty.”

The petition was filed by Ayesha Biwi, 41, who was earlier married to Mohammad Khurshid and has two children from that marriage. Ayesha alleged that her husband pronounced a verbal divorce under Muslim customs and then began threatening her after she started living with another man, the second petitioner in the case. The couple had approached Amritsar police on October 30 seeking protection, fearing backlash from relatives.

Their counsel, advocate Mohit Vashishat, cited earlier High Court rulings affirming the right of couples in live-in relationships to seek protection against threats.

Quoting from a coordinated bench judgment in Pardeep Singh & Anr. vs State of Haryana (2021), Justice Bedi noted that the concept of live-in relationships, once restricted to metropolitan circles, has found social foothold in smaller towns and rural areas. The court observed that while such relationships may conflict with traditional norms, they are neither illegal nor immoral in the eyes of the law.

“The only difference is that the relationship is not universally accepted. Would that make any difference? In my considered opinion, it would not,” the judge observed.

On the dispute over the validity of Ayesha’s alleged verbal divorce, the judge referred to a 2021 Division Bench ruling in Ishrat Bano vs State of Punjab, where the court had upheld police protection despite an incomplete or contested divorce. The emphasis, Justice Bedi said, must remain on safeguarding personal liberty rather than adjudicating marital validity at the protection stage.

Story continues below this ad

Similar protection orders have earlier been granted even where a divorce petition was pending or one partner was still legally married.

The High Court directed the Amritsar Police Commissioner to examine the couple’s representation, assess the threat perception, and take appropriate action in accordance with law. It clarified that the protection order does not prevent future proceedings such as those related to bigamy, custody, or maintenance.

Punjab’s Additional Advocate General did not oppose the limited relief.

Manraj Grewal Sharma is a senior journalist and the Resident Editor of The Indian Express in Chandigarh, where she leads the newspaper’s coverage of north India’s most politically and institutionally significant regions. From Punjab and Haryana to Himachal Pradesh and the Union Territory of Chandigarh, she oversees reporting at the intersection of governance, law, politics and society. She also reports on the diaspora, especially in Canada and the US. With a career spanning journalism across several countries, academia and international development, Manraj brings a rare depth of perspective to regional reporting. She is widely regarded as a leading chronicler of Punjab’s contemporary history and socio-political evolution, particularly its long shadow of militancy, federal tensions and identity politics. Her book, Dreams after Darkness, remains a definitive account of the militancy years and their enduring aftermath. Professional Background & Expertise A gold medalist in mass communication and a post-graduate in English literature, Manraj has a multifaceted career spanning journalism, academia, and international development. She was also awarded a fellowship by National Foundation of India and did several in-depth pieces on Manipur. Internationally, she has reported from Israel, US, UK, Myanmar, and Mauritius Her key focus areas include: Regional Politics, History, Agriculture, Diaspora, and Security. Of late, she has started focusing on Legal & Judicial Affairs: Much of her recent work involves reporting on high-stakes cases in the Punjab and Haryana High Court, ranging from environmental policy to civil rights. International Consulting: She previously served as a consulting editor for the Asia Pacific Adaptation Network and a publishing consultant for the Asian Development Bank (ADB) in Manila. Academia: For five years, she was the managing editor of Gender, Technology and Development, a peer-reviewed international journal at the Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok. Recent Notable Articles (Late 2025) Her recent reportage focuses heavily on judicial interventions and regional governance: 1. Environment & Governance "‘NGT can’t test legality of policy’: HC hears challenge to Punjab’s ‘Green Habitat’ plan" (Dec 22, 2025): Covering a critical legal battle over whether the National Green Tribunal has the authority to strike down a state policy regularizing farmhouses on delisted forest land. "High court pulls up Punjab poll panel over audio clip probe" (Dec 10, 2025): Reporting on judicial concerns regarding the transparency and fairness of local body elections. 2. Legal Rights & Social Welfare "HC issues notice to Punjab, Haryana over delay in building old age homes" (Dec 22, 2025): Reporting on a contempt petition against top officials for failing to establish government-run homes for the elderly as promised in 2019. "Victims can appeal acquittals in sessions court without seeking special leave" (Dec 19, 2025): Highlighting a significant procedural shift in criminal law following a Supreme Court ruling. "HC upholds benefits for Punjab FCI officer acquitted in 20-year-old bribery case" (Dec 19, 2025): A report on the concept of "honourable acquittal" and its impact on employee benefits. 3. Human Rights & Identity "As Punjab denies parole to MP Amritpal Singh, HC asks it to submit ‘foundational material’" (Dec 1, 2025): Covering the legal proceedings regarding the radical preacher and sitting MP's request to attend Parliament. "Protecting life paramount: HC backs Muslim woman in live-in after verbal divorce" (Nov 6, 2025): Analyzing judicial protections for personal liberty in the context of traditional practices. Signature Beats Manraj is recognized for her ability to decode complex judicial rulings and relate them to the everyday lives of citizens. Whether it is a 30-year-old land battle in Fazilka or the political implications of Kangana Ranaut’s candidacy in Mandi, her writing provides deep historical and regional context. Contact @grewal_sharma on X manrajgrewalsharma on Instagram ... Read More

 

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement