3 min readNew DelhiJul 4, 2026 04:09 AM IST
First published on: Jul 3, 2026 at 07:48 PM IST
The Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991 does not bar the government from acquiring places of worship for public purposes, the Allahabad High Court said Thursday while dismissing a writ challenging the acquisition of six mosques in Varanasi’s Dalmandi Street for expansion of the Kashi Vishwanath Dham Corridor.
A bench of Justice J J Munir and Justice Arun Kumar said, “The Act of 1991 does not prohibit the Government from acquiring religious land for larger public purposes. Under the Act of 2013, the Government has the sovereign power to acquire any property, including religious property, for public purposes, such as building roads, highways or public infrastructure.”
The bench termed the relief sought a “misconstruction of the scope of the Statute”. It was hearing a batch of pleas by shopkeepers and tenants in the Dalmandi Market area, which is about 800 metres to the east of the Kashi Vishwanath temple.
Among other protections from demolition of their shops and residences, the petitioners argued that the takeover and change of the character of the six ancient mosques would be barred under the 1991 Act. The law retrospectively froze the religious character of all places of worship except the (then) disputed structure in Ayodhya as they stood at the dawn of Independence.
The government told the bench: “The purport of the Act of 1991 is not to place beyond the pale of authority of the State’s right as the owner paramount of all lands in the territory of India and to acquire and use it for any public purpose, subject, of course, to the owner’s right to receive just and fair compensation. That is what the doctrine of eminent domain, after all, means. The Act of 1991 is not meant to derogate from that right of the State.”
According to the petitioners, the six mosques – Anjuman Intezamia Masjid, Masjid Rangile Shah, Masjid Ali Raza Khan, Masjid Karimullah Baig, Masjid Nisaran and Masjid Sangamarmar – predate the cut-off in the 1991 law.
The ruling noted that the government, in an order dated March 31, 2025 and July 30, 2025, were issued by the state government, allocating a budget of Rs 21,588.24 lakh for the purpose of “widening and beautification of the Dalmandi Street.”
The bench also dismissed the petitioner’s pleas on the grounds that they had no right to challenge the acquisition as tenants of the land. It said it had decided the pleas “without prejudice to the rights of the State, the Waqf Board and the Mutawalli of mosques concerned to suit their rights in appropriate proceedings, if and when the occasion arises. So far as the petitioners are concerned, we are of the opinion that they have no right to any of the reliefs that they seek.”
Among other protections from demolition of their shops and residences, the petitioners argued that the takeover and change of the character of the six ancient mosques would be barred under the 1991 Act. (AP file photo) 
Share
