No ambulance without Aadhaar? Telangana High Court asks Govt to clarify insistence on ID in medical emergencies
The Telangana High Court was dealing with a PIL petition that cited an incident where a girl was allegedly refused an ambulance because she did not have an Aadhaar card.
The Telangana High Court on Thursday sought to know if the possession of an Aadhaar card is a requirement for transporting a person in need of emergency medical care to the nearest hospital. The court directed the state government to file a counter-affidavit in two weeks in response to allegations of serious deficiencies in emergency medical care services.
A division bench of Chief Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh and Justice G M Mohiuddin was dealing with a public interest litigation (PIL) petition propelled by an incident where a girl was allegedly refused an ambulance because she did not have an Aadhaar card.
The PIL, filed by paralegal volunteer K Raju, stressed the incident and urged the court to direct the authorities to ensure accessible and timely emergency medical services for all, regardless of documentation.
During the hearing, the bench asked if an Aadhaar card was being insisted upon for transporting an accident victim in an ambulance. “We are only trying to find out if a person who has met with an accident and is lying on the road, some passerby calls the service, will he not be transported unless his Aadhaar card is shown?” the bench asked.
‘Bring on record the department’s stance’
When the assistant government pleader, appearing for the Department of Health, Medical and Family Welfare, responded saying that the Aadhaar card was necessary, the bench remarked that “a person who meets with an accident on the road or any person who is faced with an emergency, where he/she is not in possession of Aadhaar card, does not derive the benefit of the emergency service. Is it like that? That unless the Aadhaar is shown, the person is not transported to the nearest hospital?”
The petitioner’s counsel, B Koumuraiah, submitted that in the December 2024 incident cited in the PIL, the victim belonged to a vulnerable Scheduled Caste community. He also highlighted the inaction of the emergency services. The assistant government pleader submitted that treatment was being provided to patients even in the absence of the Aadhaar card, but the bench pointed out that the issue at hand was not about treatment but transportation to the nearest hospital.
When the assistant government pleader sought adjournment to file a counter-affidavit, the bench observed that it would be better to bring on record the department’s stance on whether any identification documentation was necessary in cases of medical emergency.
Story continues below this ad
The case was then adjourned to be listed for further hearing after three weeks.
Rahul V Pisharody is Assistant Editor with the Indian Express Online and has been reporting for IE on various news developments from Telangana since 2019. He is currently reporting on legal matters from the Telangana High Court.
Rahul started his career as a journalist in 2011 with The New Indian Express and worked in different roles at the Hyderabad bureau for over 8 years. As Deputy Metro Editor, he was in charge of the Hyderabad bureau of the newspaper and coordinated with the team of city reporters, district correspondents, other centres and internet desk for over three years.
A native of Palakkad in Kerala, Rahul has a Master's degree in Communication (Print and New Media) from the University of Hyderabad and a Bachelor's degree in Business Management from PSG College of Arts and Science, Coimbatore. ... Read More