Mumbai air pollution: HC flags ‘insufficient’ civic monitoring, forms panel to oversee mitigation norms
The Bombay High Court perused previous orders related to air pollution in Mumbai and Navi Mumbai and found that the compliance made by corporations and the Maharashtra Pollution Control Board was not satisfactory.
The Bombay High Court on Thursday decided to form a high-powered committee led by a former Supreme Court judge to oversee compliance with its past directives against violators of air-pollution mitigation norms in Mumbai and Navi Mumbai and to make recommendations. The court observed that air pollution had not gone down and that there was “insufficient monitoring” by the civic authorities.
A bench of Chief Justice Shree Chandrashekhar and Justice Gautam A Ankhad said it was not able to examine all the compliance affidavits filed by the authorities and that a high-level panel would therefore conduct regular meetings and civic authorities would assist the committee.
The bench was hearing a suo motu PIL petition and other petitions raising concerns over poor air quality in Mumbai and the surrounding areas.
“There is no dispute that the air pollution levels in the city of Mumbai has not gone down. Rather, in the month of December, it was reported very severe/unhealthy. We are also conscious and there is no dispute at the bar that the rising number of dockets and limited hours and time available to us, maybe is a reason that this court may not be able to examine all affidavits filed by the corporations and PCB and report submitted by expert committee,” the court said.
The bench perused previous orders and found that “compliance so far made by corporations and Maharashtra Pollution Control Board (MPCB)” was not sufficient and satisfactory. “Mere filing of compliance affidavits is not sufficient. The concerned authorities might have taken serious steps on their part, but the result thereof indicating decrease in pollution levels isn’t coming forth,” it added.
The judges also noted that air quality monitors were not installed at nearly 477 construction sites and other spots in Mumbai and that the civic authorities did not provide details of inspection carried out by their squads based on a report prepared by a committee of advocate commissioners that inspected nearly 31 sites.
“We have also observed that there is insufficient monitoring by corporations as well as 91 squads by BMC where working only on daily basis and if at all inspecting one site in a day. This was however admitted at the bar that for inspection of construction site, total time taken shall not exceed 2-3 hours,” they added.
Objection to demand for new compensation mechanism
Senior advocate Anil Anturkar, appearing for the Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation (NMMC), cited a Supreme Court order and objected to a submission made by the intervenor NGO Vanashakti that the high-powered committee should outline a mechanism to give compensation to residents affected by air pollution. He said there was a statutory regime in place to look into the aspect.
Story continues below this ad
Anturkar said that presence of a medical expert on the high-powered committee was not required, as the directions to be complied with were not related to health. Instead, a town planning expert can be appointed, he added.
Senior advocate S U Kamdar, appearing for the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), made similar objections and suggested an expert from IIT Bombay should be made a part of the panel.
The bench, however, said it had not come across any suggestion or action taken by such a statutory body and that the panel could seek assistance from technical and medical experts.
“All of you are working and working very hard, hopefully. We don’t want to criticise anyone. We just want that the people should live in pure air,” the bench orally remarked to the authorities and said it would empower the panel with powers to “issue directions in the form of recommendations”.
Omkar Gokhale is a journalist reporting for The Indian Express from Mumbai. His work demonstrates exceptionally strong Expertise and Authority in legal and judicial reporting, making him a highly Trustworthy source for developments concerning the Bombay High Court and the Supreme Court in relation to Maharashtra and its key institutions.
Expertise & Authority
Affiliation: Reports for The Indian Express, a national newspaper known for its rigorous journalistic standards, lending significant Trustworthiness to his legal coverage.
Core Authority & Specialization: Omkar Gokhale's work is almost exclusively dedicated to the complex field of legal affairs and jurisprudence, specializing in:
Bombay High Court Coverage: He provides detailed, real-time reports on the orders, observations, and decisions of the Bombay High Court's principal and regional benches. Key subjects include:
Fundamental Rights & Environment: Cases on air pollution, the right to life of residents affected by dumping sites, and judicial intervention on critical infrastructure (e.g., Ghodbunder Road potholes).
Civil & Criminal Law: Reporting on significant bail orders (e.g., Elgaar Parishad case), compensation for rail-related deaths, and disputes involving high-profile individuals (e.g., Raj Kundra and Shilpa Shetty).
Constitutional and Supreme Court Matters: Reports and analysis on key legal principles and Supreme Court warnings concerning Maharashtra, such as those related to local body elections, reservations, and the creamy layer verdict.
Governance and Institution Oversight: Covers court rulings impacting public bodies like the BMC (regularisation of illegal structures) and the State Election Commission (postponement of polls), showcasing a focus on judicial accountability.
Legal Interpretation: Reports on public speeches and observations by prominent judicial figures (e.g., former Chief Justice B. R. Gavai) on topics like free speech, gender equality, and institutional challenges.
Omkar Gokhale's consistent, focused reporting on the judiciary establishes him as a definitive and authoritative voice for legal developments originating from Mumbai and impacting the entire state of Maharashtra. ... Read More
