During the Supreme Court hearing today, Mamata Banerjee had argued that the SIR process is only for deletion, not for inclusion. She submitted that the 'micro observers' were appointed to bulldoze the people of Bengal. Banerjee further alleged that Bengal was being targeted on the eve of election. She also contended that the logical discrepancy case should not be deleted and should be cleared by DO and ERO and not by the 'micro-observers'.
West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee leaves the Supreme court after appearing in case pending to the SIR matter in New Delhi on Wednesday. (Express Photo by Tashi Tobgyal)Mamata Banerjee vs Election Commission of India, SC West Bengal SIR Hearing Today Updates: West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee Wednesday said Bengal was being “targeted” by the Election Commission and SIR was meant to “bulldoze” the people of Bengal.
“Only for Bengal they are appointed micro-observers. Only for Bengal they appointed these micro observers to bulldoze the people of Bengal. My submission is the logical discrepancy case not to be deleted and as it is it should be cleared not by the micro-observers,” she submitted before a bench of Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul Pancholi.
Banerjee, who is the first sitting CM to appear and argue before the top court, had sought permission to personally argue her petition challenging the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls being undertaken by the Election Commission of India (ECI).
Banerjee had moved an interlocutory application seeking leave to address the court in person and was present in the court number 1 along with her legal team.
She had earlier approached the apex court under Article 32 of the Constitution, assailing the SIR exercise.
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.jsAddressing the Hon’ble Court, Smt. @mamataofficial placed real-life cases on record, backed by reports from leading newspapers. Clarifying, she stated: “These are not my photographs. These are from reputed newspapers.”
— All India Trinamool Congress (@AITCofficial) February 4, 2026
She explained that the SIR is being used almost entirely as… pic.twitter.com/2gaO51NyHT
AITC's tweet
Mamata: We are very grateful, sir.
CJI: We can find out practical solution.
On Monday, give us list of Group B officers you can spare and provide to them for their assistance, the CJI says.
Issues notice to the Centre on Mamata's plea.
Bench dictates order-
Issue notice in both the matters. We have briefly heard the counsels on behalf of the petitioners and learned senior counsels representing the ECI. During the course of hearing, it is pointed out by the solicitor general of India that there is another petition and the issues raised therein and the affidavits filed by the ECI will have bearing on the merits of these cases. Consequently that writ petition is also ordered to be taken along with these cases on Monday. The parties shall have respective instructions on the day fixed.
Mamata: My last submission. They deleted 58 lakh and have not scope of appeal even form 6. They are only targeting Bengal. Only for Bengal they are appointed micro-observers. Only for Bengal they appointed these micro observers to bulldoze the people of Bengal. My submission is the logical discrepancy case not to be deleted and as it is it should be cleared not by the micro-observers.
I convey my regards to the court. Safe democracy, she says.
Mamata: It’s a WhatsApp Commission (EC) where micro observers are allowed to overrule BLO and delete names sitting in office.
CM makes an argument that micro observers are appointed from BJP ruled states and names are being unilaterally deleted.
The CM says the process is 'anti-women'. They are not allowing the domicile certificates, she submits.
Mamata: Their SIR process is only for deletion, not for inclusion
Mamata questions what was the hurry? "What takes two years is happening in three months. More than 100 people died. Many BLOs committed suicide," she says. Bengal is targeted. Why not Assam?
CJI: Madam Mamata, let me clarify two-three things, about the Adhaar card, this matter is about SIR validity issue. It is being argued before us for the last two months. We have reserved the judgment therefore we are not in a position to comment with regard to credibility or admissibility about the adhaar. that issue has been argued and we have reserved judgment.
CJI: Second you have pointed out the issue of discrepancy. In this case one way can be you can give a team of officers, the EC can take them that those can also be part of the EC team, verify whether it is a spelling mistake or it is only because of local dialect
Banerjee says there are people working in offices are transferred. "Bengal people are happy that this court gave order Adhaar and other documents are allowed," the CM submits.
Mamata says, If allowed she can place some photographs before the court. "Suppose a daughter after getting married, if she changes title, it's also mismatched," she submits.
CJI says that the state of West Bengal in its own right has also filed a petition. One of the best counsels in this court are there. Mr Sibal is there. On January 19, Mr Sibal explained the procedural difficulties of state and where state had genuine apprehension of exclusion of the citizens who are residents of WB.
Mamata: May I explain you because i belong to that state. I am very grateful because of your kindness and my humble regards to our Justices, lawyers. The problem is always our lawyers fight for the case from the beginning but when we are not getting justice, justice is crying behind the door, I quote Rabindranath Tagore, we are not getting justice anywhere. I have written 6 letters to CEC including all the details but no reply. I am a bonded labour. I am a very less important person. I am from a common family. I am fighting for my party
Banerjee says she has written so many letters to the election commission.
Banerjee says justice is crying behind doors.
Banerjee asks if she can explain the discrepancies. 'I am very grateful and my humble regards to honorable CJI and Justices Bagchi and Pancholi.
Diwan: The bulk of discrepancies are related to name. The 2003 voter list was in Bengali and in translation to English, it is deemed as logical discrepancy.
CJI: We were told list is not the only communication. There's also individual notice to persons
Senior advocate Rakesh Dwivedi for ECI: All notices contain reasons and they were permitted to take authorised agents.
Diwan: We seek direction to ECI to withdraw all notices which pertain to name mismatch/descrepancy.
Diwan: A majority of the logical discrepancy cases, more than 50%, are cases of minor name mismatches and are spelling variations
Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi appears through VC.
Diwan: This is one of our grievances that panchayat residence certificate , the family registers, the domicile certificates, Adhaar cards, OBC certificates and land allotment certificates , none of these are being accepted despite the orders of the court.
He takes the bench through numbers. Says number of days left for final publication of electoral rolls, 11 days. Number of days left to complete hearings, four. Number of voters characterised as unmapped at present are 32 lakhs. Post draft roll remains at 1.36 crore (20% of electorate).
Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, who is representing other petitioners in related matter appears through VC.
Senior advocate Shyam Diwan appearing for the CM starts making submissions. Diwan refers to Court's last order issuing directions to ECI (regarding logical discrepancy category).
The bench says it will take up the matter after a one-two fresh matters.
Banerjee, in her plea has sought setting aside of the ECI's SIR notification dated June 24, 2025 and October 27, 2025.
In her letter to the CEC, she warned that continuing the exercise in its present form could lead to “mass disenfranchisement” and strike at the foundations of democracy.
In a letter dated January 3 to CEC Gyanesh Kumar, Banerjee accused the poll panel of overseeing an “unplanned, ill-prepared and ad hoc” process marred by “serious irregularities, procedural violations and administrative lapses”.
In her plea before the Supreme Court, Banerjee has sought directions to stop the deletion of names of the voters from the rolls.
TMC leaders had earlier said an application has been moved in the court for her to appear as a “party in person”. Mamata has an LLB degree from Jogesh Chandra Chaudhuri Law College under Calcutta University. Party leaders said she last practised as a lawyer in 2003.
CM Banerjee, on February 2, led a delegation of TMC leaders along with 12 “SIR-affected” people to meet Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar in New Delhi. She alleged that 58 lakh voters were deleted from draft rolls during the SIR and questioned the conduct of the exercise three months before Assembly elections.
On January 19, the Supreme Court had passed a slew of directions to ECI for transparent verification of persons in logical discrepancy list on pleas by Trinamool Congress leaders alleging procedural irregularities in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in West Bengal.
Earlier, Banerjee had written letters to the Chief Election Commissioner over the SIR exercise, calling the exercise a “farce” and harassment of people.
Heavy security deployed at Supreme Court, ahead of the hearing into SIR (Special Intensive Revision) and appearance of West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee before the apex court.
In New Delhi on Wednesday Express photo By Amit Mehra.


Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul Pancholi assemble.
Banerjee filed her petition on January 28, naming the ECI and the West Bengal Chief Electoral Officer as respondents.
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.jsVIDEO | Delhi: West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee reaches Supreme Court for hearing of a plea filed by her challenging the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in the state.
— Press Trust of India (@PTI_News) February 4, 2026
(Full video available on PTI Videos - https://t.co/n147TvrpG7) pic.twitter.com/bffRWFgBYY
CM Banerjee in Supreme Court for hearing of her plea challenging SIR
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js#watch | Delhi: West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee in Supreme Court to appear before the apex court in the SIR (Special Intensive Revision) matter today pic.twitter.com/Eqi5v2QrWv
— ANI (@ANI) February 4, 2026
CM Mamata arrives in Supreme Court
She has also requested that all valid identification documents issued by competent authorities be accepted as proof.
Additionally, she has sought directions restraining electoral authorities from calling voters for hearings in cases involving name mismatches or spelling variations classified as “logical discrepancies”, urging that such corrections be made suo motu on the basis of available records.
In her petition, Banerjee has sought the quashing of various directions and instructions issued by the ECI.
She has also prayed that the 2026 West Bengal Assembly elections be conducted on the basis of the existing electoral rolls, and not on rolls revised pursuant to the SIR.
Banerjee holds a law degree from Jogesh Chandra Choudhury College of Law, Calcutta, and last practised as an advocate in 2003.
Nearly a month ago, Mamata had said that she would move the Supreme Court “as an ordinary citizen” to protect the democratic rights of citizens. At the Gangasagar rally in South 24 Parganas district, the chief minister had said that she would seek special permission to appear before the Supreme Court. “If necessary, I will go to the Supreme Court and plead for the people. I will speak for the people,” she said.


