A Maharashtra court built for adivasi justice had no judge, twice, until the Supreme Court noticed

Vacancies at the Aheri sessions court in Gadchiroli brought trials to a standstill for months, forcing undertrials and lawyers to travel long distances, until a bail hearing for Surendra Gadling, a co-accused in the Bhima-Koregaon case, in the Supreme Court this month triggered action.

courtCourt records show that without a full-time judge, only urgent bail applications and pleas seeking extension of time to file chargesheets were taken up by in-charge courts. (Express photo by Jayprakash S Naidu)

When the lawyer of Surendra Gadling, a co-accused in the Bhima-Koregaon case, told the Supreme Court on January 21 that a 2016 trial against him over arson allegations had not yet started, for the irregular presence of a judge and a permanent prosecutor in the court concerned, it showed how an idea conceived to bring justice to closer to adivasi communities in Maoist-hit Gadchiroli has been hit.

Gadling faces allegations of conspiracy in the burning of 76 vehicles carrying iron ore from the Surjagarh mines on December 25, 2016. His lawyer said his discharge application had been pending at the one-judge District and Additional Sessions Court in Aheri since 2022 as it did not have a judge at the time, or a permanent prosecutor.

Following this, the Supreme Court directed that the Registrar General of the Bombay High Court take steps for “… the regular posting of a competent judge… within a period of seven days”. It was only after this hearing that the vacancy was filled. Two days later, a judge was appointed.

While officials said the process to appoint a judge had already been underway, and that these take time given the sensitivity of the post, it meant 22 days in January when the court had no judge (between 1st and 22nd). And Court records show that the January vacancy was not an isolated instance.

The same court, inaugurated in 2023 by the then Supreme Court Justice Bhushan R Gavai with the promise of bringing justice closer to 725 villages in Maoist-affected, adivasi-dominated talukas, had earlier also remained without a judge for nearly three months in 2025, effectively suspending trials, bail hearings and routine judicial work.

When a judge finally took charge on July 22, 2025, he found more than 200 undertrial cases pending, many of them involving accused who had been in jail for years. “This court has taken charge of this court on 22nd July 2025 and found more than 200 undertrials cases and several bail applications were pending, which were decided on priority,” a court order dated October 6, 2025, records.

During the three-month vacancy, trials could not proceed. Accused were not produced from jails for hearings. Lawyers were forced to travel to Gadchiroli, over 120 km away, where an additional charge of the Aheri court had been assigned to a judge. Undertrials even wrote from jail to the Gadchiroli court and the Bombay High Court, seeking transfer of their cases as proceedings had come to a standstill.

Story continues below this ad

Court records show that without a full-time judge, only urgent bail applications and pleas seeking extension of time to file chargesheets were taken up by in-charge courts. In one case, an accused arrested in 2020 sought bail citing that despite charges being framed in 2023 on Supreme Court directions, no witness had been examined till July 2025. In another, an accused remained in jail for over a year because he could not furnish a surety of Rs 30,000, and was released only in August 2025 — after a judge was appointed.

The bar association also took up the matter then. Rajendra Prasad Menganwar, president of the Aheri Bar Association, told The Indian Express that the reason for setting up the court in Aheri was to ensure that litigants and lawyers did not have to travel up to 200 km for a court hearing. “In 2025, when there was no appointment for three months, we would go to the Gadchiroli court for urgent hearings… We then met the administrative authorities of the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court seeking that the vacancy be filled… Thankfully, it was done immediately.”

Officials of the court pointed out that the court has several crucial cases on its rolls involving the UAPA, linked to alleged Maoist activities, and hence judicial appointments required careful scrutiny. That was one reason for the careful consideration before the choice of a judge, they said.

An email sent to the Bombay High Court on the delay in appointment did not receive a response.

Story continues below this ad

The Aheri court had fulfilled a demand going back to at least 2008, to bring courts closer so that litigants, accused and victims did not have to travel long distances through Maoist-affected forest roads with poor connectivity and irregular transport, often requiring overnight stays, just to attend routine hearings.

A magistrate court was inaugurated in 2015, followed by the Sessions Court in July 2023.

At the inauguration, Gavai had said the court would help deliver justice to 725 villages across Aheri, Mulchera, Sironcha, Bhamragad and Etapalli talukas, noting that Gadchiroli’s size and terrain made travel to the district headquarters difficult. “…justice system has come to the doorsteps of the tribals in Gadchiroli,” he had said.

Sadaf Modak is a distinguished Legal Correspondent based in Mumbai whose work demonstrates exceptional Expertise and Authority in covering the intricacies of the judicial and correctional systems. Reporting for The Indian Express, she is a highly Trustworthy source for in-depth coverage of courtroom proceedings and human rights issues. Expertise  Specialized Role: As a dedicated Legal Correspondent, Sadaf Modak possesses deep, specialized knowledge of legal procedures, statutes, and judicial operations, lending immense Authority to her reports. Core Authority & Focus: Her work primarily centers on: Trial Court Proceedings: She mainly covers the trial courts of Mumbai, providing crucial, on-the-ground reporting on the day-to-day legal processes that affect citizens. She maintains a keen eye on both major criminal cases and the "ordinary and not so ordinary events" that reveal the human element within the justice system. Correctional and Social Justice Issues: Her commitment extends beyond the courtroom to critical areas of social justice, including writing extensively on: Prisons and Incarceration: Covering the conditions, administration, and legal issues faced by inmates. Juvenile Justice: Reporting on the complexities of the juvenile justice system and the legal rights of children. Human Rights: Focusing on fundamental human rights within the context of law enforcement and state institutions. Experience Institutional Affiliation: Reporting for The Indian Express—a leading national newspaper—ensures her coverage is subject to high editorial standards of accuracy, impartiality, and legal rigor. Impactful Detail: Her focus on trial courts provides readers with direct, detailed insights into the workings of the justice system, making complex legal narratives accessible and establishing her as a reliable and trusted chronicler of the legal landscape. Sadaf Modak's blend of judicial focus and commitment to human rights issues establishes her as a vital and authoritative voice in Indian legal journalism. She tweets @sadafmodak ... Read More

 

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement