‘Courts can’t impound passport as bail condition’: Madras High Court says only one authority can
The petitioner argued before the Madras High Court that the direction to surrender his passport as a bail condition violated his fundamental rights, and was beyond the powers of the sessions court.
The Madras High Court observed that the Passports Act is a special legislation which prevails over a general law, such as the CrPC. (Image generated using AI)
Madras High Court news: The Madras High Court recently held that a trial court cannot direct an accused to surrender his passport as a condition for bail, observing that the power to impound passports lies exclusively with passport authorities under the law.
Justice P Dhanabal passed the order on April 6 while partly allowing a petition filed by an accused who had challenged certain conditions imposed by a sessions court while granting him bail.
Impounding of a passport cannot be done by the court under CrPC Section 104, Justice P Dhanabal stated.
“The passport authorities alone can impound passport and the trial Court while granting bail cannot impose such a condition to deposit the passport,” the Madras High Court ruled.
The petitioner was booked over offences under sections 294(b) (singing or uttering obscene song or words at/near a public place), 417 (cheating) and 506(i) (criminal intimidation) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
He was arrested in December 2025 and later granted bail in January 2026.
Subsequently, the sessions court modified the bail conditions, directing him not to leave India without prior permission, to surrender his passport before the jurisdictional magistrate, and to mark his presence before the police every week.
Challenging these conditions, the petitioner argued that the direction to surrender his passport violated his fundamental rights under Article 21 (protection of life and liberty) of the Constitution and was beyond the powers of the sessions court.
He contended that under the Passports Act, only designated passport authorities are empowered to impound or take custody of a passport.
Opposing the plea, the government advocate appearing for the state said that, considering the gravity of the offence, the sessions court directed the petitioner to surrender the passport before the concerned jurisdictional magistrate court.
He argued that the sessions court imposed the condition to secure the petitioner’s presence.
‘Special law prevails over general’
The Madras High Court, relying on various precedents, noted that courts can impound any document or thing other than a passport.
The court may, if it thinks fit, impound any document or thing produced before it under Section 104 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), the high court said, adding that the provision is only applicable to documents other than a passport.
The Madras High Court further observed that the Passports Act is a special legislation which prevails over a general law, such as the CrPC.
Therefore, impounding of a passport cannot be done by the court under CrPC Section 104 though it can impound any other document or thing.
The court noted that the sessions court had imposed the condition of surrendering the passport, which was not in accordance with the law.
Accordingly, the Madras High Court set aside the bail condition requiring surrender of the passport, while retaining the other bail conditions, including restrictions on travel abroad and the requirement to report to the police periodically.
Ashish Shaji is a Senior Sub-Editor at The Indian Express, where he specializes in legal journalism. Combining a formal education in law with years of editorial experience, Ashish provides authoritative coverage and nuanced analysis of court developments and landmark judicial decisions for a national audience.
Expertise
Legal Core Competency: Ashish is a law graduate (BA LLB) from IME Law College, CCSU. This academic foundation allows him to move beyond surface-level reporting, offering readers a deep-dive into the technicalities of statutes, case law, and legal precedents.
Specialized Legal Reporting: His work at The Indian Express focuses on translating the often-dense proceedings of India's top courts into clear, actionable news. His expertise includes:
Judicial Analysis: Breaking down complex orders from the Supreme Court and various High Courts.
Legal Developments: Monitoring legislative changes and their practical implications for the public and the legal fraternity.
Industry Experience: With over 5 years in the field, Ashish has contributed to several niche legal and professional platforms, honing his ability to communicate complex information. His previous experience includes:
Lawsikho: Gaining insights into legal education and practical law.
Verdictum: Focusing on high-quality legal news and court updates.
Enterslice: Working at the intersection of legal, financial, and advisory services. ... Read More