Late by ‘317 minutes’ in reaching destination, man wins Rs 60,000 from Railways

The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Seraikela-Kharsawan, observed that the Railways failed to explain the delay or establish that it occurred due to circumstances beyond its control.

Train late railwaysThe complainant alleged that the train was delayed by 317 minutes. (Image generated using AI)

A consumer commission in Jharkhand has directed South Eastern Railway to pay Rs 60,000 to a passenger after finding that the five-hour delay of the KBJ Ispat Express amounted to a deficiency in service and caused mental agony to the passenger.

President Sunil Kumar Singh and members Pradeep Kumar Mishra and Sanju Shahi observed that the Railways failed to explain the delay or establish that it occurred due to circumstances beyond its control.

“We find much substance in case of the complainant and it has been established by the complainant that there was deficiency on the part of OP’s causing harassment and mental agony to the complainant. Hence the complainant is entitled to compensation from the OP’s for their deficiency of service,” the order read.

Delayed journey

The complainant stated that he had booked a train ticket in KBJ Ispat Express for travel from Tatanagar to Sambalpur on October 13, 2024. The train was scheduled to depart Tatanagar at 10:18 am and reach Sambalpur at 3:50 pm. The complainant claimed that it reached the destination 317 minutes late, causing him physical inconvenience, mental agony and harassment. Therefore, he sought Rs 2.5 lakh as compensation.

The South Eastern Railway opposed the complaint, arguing that the consumer commission lacked jurisdiction because claims relating to railways fall under the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987. It also contended that the complaint was defective as the ticket had been booked through IRCTC, which was not impleaded as a party, and that the Kharagpur Division should also have been made a party to the proceedings. It therefore denied any liability for deficiency in service.

The commission held that consumer fora are competent to entertain complaints alleging deficiency in railway services. “The Honble SC and National Consumer Commission in several cases has held that the District Consumer Commission has got jurisdiction to adjudicate the case for deficiency of Services,” the commission said. It relied on the Supreme Court’s decision, where the court held that passengers’ time is valuable and that the Railways are liable to compensate passengers for delayed trains unless they prove that the delay was beyond their control and adequately justified.

“In the instant case OP has not filed any evidence explaining delay of train by more than five hours and OP failed to establish delay occurred which was beyond their control. Complainant has proved his case by oral documentary evidence,” the commission noted.

Story continues below this ad

Holding that the complainant had established deficiency in service, the commission directed the Senior Divisional Operations Manager, South Eastern Railway, Chakradharpur Division, and the General Manager, South Eastern Railway, Kolkata, to pay Rs 50,000 as compensation for harassment and mental agony and Rs 10,000 towards litigation expenses within 45 days.

Takeaway

Public service providers, including the Railways, can be held liable under the Consumer Protection Act for unreasonable delays if they fail to justify them. When a train is significantly delayed and the Railways cannot produce evidence showing that the delay was beyond their control, it may amount to deficiency in service.

For consumer-related grievances, individuals may contact the consumer helpline in their respective states and Union territories (Jharkhand: 18003456598) or call the National Consumer Helpline at 1915 for assistance.

Don’t miss out on these stories

‘Faulty’ boat engine leaves Kerala fisherman stranded at sea, company to pay Rs 57,000  

Story continues below this ad

85% ‘pure’ silver tumbler fails purity test, Telangana man wins Rs 13,000

41-seater bus ‘overcrowded’ with 96 passengers, man wins Rs 15,000 payout

Ashish Shaji is a Senior Sub-Editor at The Indian Express (Digital), where he specialises in legal journalism. Combining a formal education in law with years of editorial experience, Ashish covers court developments and key cases for the audience. Expertise Ashish is a law graduate (BA LLB) from IME Law College, CCSU. His work at The Indian Express focuses on translating the often-dense proceedings of courts into clear, legal content. He also runs liveblogs from the Supreme Court and various High Courts. Industry Experience: With over 5 years in the field, Ashish has contributed to several niche legal and professional platforms, honing his ability to communicate complex information. His previous experience includes: Lawsikho: Gaining insights into legal education and practical law. Verdictum: Focusing on high-quality legal news and court updates. Enterslice: Working at the intersection of legal, financial, and advisory services. ... Read More

 

Advertisement
Loading Recommendations...
Advertisement
Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments