4 min readMumbaiUpdated: Feb 22, 2026 02:31 AM IST
The court also recorded that Sinha “has unique style of dialogue delivery and is especially known for the unique manner of delivery of term ‘Khamosh’, which is widely recognised and associated with the plaintiff”. (Express File Photo)
The Bombay High Court has granted ad-interim relief to Bollywood actor Shatrughan Sinha by restraining certain websites, social media accounts, artificial intelligence (AI)-linked entities, and others, including John Doe (all unknown persons), from misusing and exploiting his personality rights including his name, image, vocal mannerisms, signature phrases like ‘Khamosh’, etc. without his consent or authorisation.
The court on February 16 passed an order on the interim application in a commercial intellectual property rights infringement suit by the actor and Trinamool Congress MP, seeking removal of the infringing content and restraining the platforms from misappropriation of his personality rights and moral rights.
The order was made available on Saturday.
A single-judge bench of Justice Sharmila U Deshmukh observed, “Prima facie, there cannot be any debate about goodwill and reputation of the plaintiff as well as his remarkable and unparalleled contribution to the film industry. The plaintiff has his official social media channels which has followers in lakhs,” the court order records.
The court also recorded that Sinha “has unique style of dialogue delivery and is especially known for the unique manner of delivery of term ‘Khamosh’, which is widely recognised and associated with the plaintiff”.
Advocates Hiren Kamod, Nidhi Singh, Abha Shah and Amisha Upadhyay claimed that Sinha’s “personality attributes constitutes his valuable personality rights which has been unauthorisedly commercially exploited and misused in various mediums by the Defendants and the Defendants are also liable for committing tort of passing-off”.
The actor also sought urgent interim relief, alleging large-scale misuse of his identity through counterfeit merchandise, among others.
Kamod also alleged that various platforms were creating, publishing and circulating fabricated and manipulated content impersonating Sinha through obscene, morphed, pornographic video-graphs and fake endorsements and the same was required to be restrained.
After perusing submissions, the high court observed, “In the present case, there is sufficient material which is produced on record to demonstrate the violation of the plaintiff’s personality rights. There cannot be any justification for misutilising the plaintiff’s personality for commercial exploitation which ultimately results into dilution and tarnishing the plaintiff’s image. The creation of digital content without the authority of the plaintiff and exploiting the same unauthorisedly violates the plaintiff’s right.”
Justice Deshmukh, therefore, “prima facie” opined, “Sinha’s name, likeness, image, persona, etc. deserves to be protected in view of the material which has been placed on record which prima facie demonstrate the infringement of the plaintiff’s personality rights and public rights and violate his privacy.”
The high court will hear the plea next on March 30.
Other celebrities whose personality rights are protected by the Bombay HC
Sinha is one of the few celebrities who availed such a relief from the high court since last year. In October last year, the high court had protected the personality rights of Bollywood actor Akshay Kumar, citing “realistic nature of deep fake videos was alarming”.
Story continues below this ad
The Bombay high court also protected the personal rights of veteran singer Asha Bhosle and Bollywood actor Suniel Shetty through interim orders last year. In 2024, the high court had protected the personality rights of singer Arijit Singh.
In December 2025, the vacation bench of the high court, in an interim order, had directed various platforms to delete and pull down links, posts, URLs and websites carrying allegedly morphed and manipulated images and videos of actor Shilpa Shetty.
Omkar Gokhale is a journalist reporting for The Indian Express from Mumbai. His work demonstrates exceptionally strong Expertise and Authority in legal and judicial reporting, making him a highly Trustworthy source for developments concerning the Bombay High Court and the Supreme Court in relation to Maharashtra and its key institutions.
Expertise & Authority
Affiliation: Reports for The Indian Express, a national newspaper known for its rigorous journalistic standards, lending significant Trustworthiness to his legal coverage.
Core Authority & Specialization: Omkar Gokhale's work is almost exclusively dedicated to the complex field of legal affairs and jurisprudence, specializing in:
Bombay High Court Coverage: He provides detailed, real-time reports on the orders, observations, and decisions of the Bombay High Court's principal and regional benches. Key subjects include:
Fundamental Rights & Environment: Cases on air pollution, the right to life of residents affected by dumping sites, and judicial intervention on critical infrastructure (e.g., Ghodbunder Road potholes).
Civil & Criminal Law: Reporting on significant bail orders (e.g., Elgaar Parishad case), compensation for rail-related deaths, and disputes involving high-profile individuals (e.g., Raj Kundra and Shilpa Shetty).
Constitutional and Supreme Court Matters: Reports and analysis on key legal principles and Supreme Court warnings concerning Maharashtra, such as those related to local body elections, reservations, and the creamy layer verdict.
Governance and Institution Oversight: Covers court rulings impacting public bodies like the BMC (regularisation of illegal structures) and the State Election Commission (postponement of polls), showcasing a focus on judicial accountability.
Legal Interpretation: Reports on public speeches and observations by prominent judicial figures (e.g., former Chief Justice B. R. Gavai) on topics like free speech, gender equality, and institutional challenges.
Omkar Gokhale's consistent, focused reporting on the judiciary establishes him as a definitive and authoritative voice for legal developments originating from Mumbai and impacting the entire state of Maharashtra. ... Read More