Kerala man misses train due to departure ‘before’ scheduled time, wins Rs 31,000

The commission emphasised that the system and the working culture of the public transportation needs to improve if it has to survive, adding that the passengers cannot be at the mercy of the authorities.

Indian Railways consumer court caseThe complainant alleged that the train departed nearly three hours early. (Image generated using AI)

The Thiruvananthapuram district consumer commission recently directed Railways to pay Rs 31,784 to a passenger while holding it guilty of deficiency in service for not intimating him about his train’s early departure.

President P V Jayarajan and members Preetha G Nair and Viju V R observed that the non-intimation of the early departure of the train from the scheduled time amounts to deficiency in service.

“The railways must provide valid reasons for the early departure of the train. If the public transportation has to survive, they have to improve the system and their working culture. Passengers cannot be at the mercy of the authorities,” the order dated July 21 read.

Early departure

The complainant stated that he, his family and his friends’ family had booked train tickets for a group of 10 people travelling from Thiruvananthapuram to Mookambika Temple. The onward journey was on the Malabar Express while the return journey from Mangaluru to Thiruvananthapuram was booked on the Nizamuddin–Thiruvananthapuram Superfast Express.

The complainant said that when the group reached Mangaluru railway station around 5 pm on November 3, he checked the “Where is My Train” mobile application, which showed the train would arrive at 5: 40 pm. However, after making enquiries at the station, he learnt that the train had already departed at 2.50 pm, about two hours and 50 minutes before time. He alleged that no prior intimation had been given about the revised departure schedule. With no alternative arranged by railway authorities, the group purchased general class tickets on the Antyodaya Express for Rs 2,200 to return home.

Feeling aggrieved, the complainant moved consumer commission seeking refund and compensation.

Southern Railway contested the complaint, arguing that the change was part of the annual switch from the monsoon timetable to the non-monsoon timetable effective from November 1. It claimed that wide publicity is given through newspapers about the change in timetables and that passengers booking tickets online were sent a note advising them to check the revised timetable. It also contended that the complainant relied on a private application, “Where is My Train”, instead of the Railways’ official National Train Enquiry System (NTES).

Story continues below this ad

The commission observed that the Railways failed to prove about its prior intimation to the passengers regarding train timings. It noted that the passengers have the right to timely and quality services and they shouldn’t be subjected to the whims and fancies of the administration, adding that the railways must provide valid reasons for the early departure of the train.

The commission emphasised that the system and the working culture of the public transportation needs to improve if it has to survive, stating that the passengers cannot be at the mercy of the authorities.

It therefore directed Southern Railway and the Thiruvananthapuram division to jointly and severally refund the ticket fare and pay Rs 25,000 as compensation for the mental agony. It also awarded Rs 3,000 as litigation costs.

Takeaway

The order underscores that failure to communicate significant changes such as an advance in departure time amounts to deficiency in service, making transport authorities liable to compensate affected passengers.

Story continues below this ad

For consumer-related grievances, individuals may contact the consumer helpline in their respective states and Union territories (Kerala: 18004251550) or call the National Consumer Helpline at 1915 for assistance.

 

Ashish Shaji is a Senior Sub-Editor at The Indian Express (Digital), where he specialises in legal journalism. Combining a formal education in law with years of editorial experience, Ashish covers court developments and key cases for the audience. Expertise Ashish is a law graduate (BA LLB) from IME Law College, CCSU. His work at The Indian Express focuses on translating the often-dense proceedings of courts into clear, legal content. He also runs liveblogs from the Supreme Court and various High Courts. Industry Experience: With over 5 years in the field, Ashish has contributed to several niche legal and professional platforms, honing his ability to communicate complex information. His previous experience includes: Lawsikho: Gaining insights into legal education and practical law. Verdictum: Focusing on high-quality legal news and court updates. Enterslice: Working at the intersection of legal, financial, and advisory services. ... Read More

 

Advertisement
Loading Recommendations...
Advertisement
Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments