Premium

Pay up: Kerala High Court rejects cash crunch excuse for KSRTC’s provident fund dues

The Kerala High Court was hearing petitions filed by drivers, conductors and mechanics of the Kerala State Road Transport Corporation seeking directions to sanction and disburse provident fund advances.

kerala high court ksrtc pf duesThe petitioners in the case included drivers, conductors, mechanics, and inspectors working at KSRTC’s Kattappana depot, the Kerala High Court noted. (Image generated using AI)

Kerala High Court ruling on PF dues: A state-run corporation’s financial difficulties cannot justify the indefinite withholding of employees’ provident fund (PF) dues, the Kerala High Court has ruled, while directing the State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC) to release pending PF advances to six employees within a strict three-month timeline.

Justice Viju Abraham, in an order dated April 10, 2026, noted that the petitioners included drivers, conductors, mechanics, and inspectors working at KSRTC’s Kattappana depot.

justice viju abraham kerala high court Justice Viju Abraham directed KSRTC to disburse the amounts applied for by the petitioners within three months.

“Whatever that may be, the amount legally due to the petitioners cannot be kept indefinitely only for the reason of the financial difficulties faced by the respondent-Corporation,” the Kerala High Court order read.

It was further observed that each of the petitioners was entitled to quantified sums ranging from approximately Rs 2.24 lakh to Rs 5.03 lakh, which had remained undisputed but unpaid.

Taking note that there was no dispute regarding entitlement and that the delay was solely on account of the corporation’s financial constraints, the court held that such dues cannot be withheld indefinitely once they are legally payable.

Accordingly, the Kerala High Court disposed of the petition by directing KSRTC to sanction and disburse the provident fund amounts applied for by the petitioners without delay, and in any case, within an outer limit of three months.

GPF must be shared with mother, wife

Previously, the Supreme Court allowed a woman’s plea to receive her share of the general provident fund (GPF) amount accumulated through her late husband’s employment despite his mother being the only nominee.

Story continues below this ad

A bench of Justices Sanjay Karol and N Kotiswar Singh found that the nomination form itself makes such a nomination void after the subscriber acquires a family, and allows the distribution of funds with all eligible family members in equal shares.

The bench, while allowing the wife’s plea, noted that the nomination was in favour of the late employee’s mother, but added, “The condition stipulated in the nomination form rendered such nomination, at the time of death, void.”

The apex court further said that the provident nomination form and its clause itself do not provide a better claim to the mother over the employee’s wife.

The husband, in this case, was a government official who married the petitioner in 2003 and subsequently nominated her as a recipient for other service benefits, but did not change the nominations for GPF.

Story continues below this ad

The Supreme Court noted that the wife had already received her share of GPF as per the previous order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) and directed the release of the other half of the remaining funds to the employee’s mother.

Richa Sahay is a Legal Correspondent for The Indian Express, where she focuses on simplifying the complexities of the Indian judicial system. A law postgraduate, she leverages her advanced legal education to bridge the gap between technical court rulings and public understanding, ensuring that readers stay informed about the rapidly evolving legal landscape. Expertise Advanced Legal Education: As a law postgraduate, Richa possesses the academic depth required to interpret intricate statutes and constitutional nuances. Her background allows her to provide more than just summaries; she offers context-driven analysis of how legal changes impact the average citizen. Specialized Beat: She operates at the intersection of law and public policy, focusing on: Judicial Updates: Providing timely reports on orders from the Supreme Court of India and various High Courts. Legal Simplification: Translating dense "legalese" into accessible, engaging narratives without sacrificing factual accuracy. Legislative Changes: Monitoring new bills, amendments, and regulatory shifts that shape Indian society. ... Read More

 

Advertisement
Loading Recommendations...
Advertisement
Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments