‘Irreparable prejudice’: Karnataka High Court asks private bank to unfreeze account over ‘receiving’ Rs 240 from cyber fraudsters

Acting on the communication, the bank froze the account that had around Rs 10,000 at the time.

Advocate Sirajuddin Ahmed, appearing for the petitioner, argued that the measure adopted by the bank has the effect of disabling the petitioner from accessing a substantially higher amount than what is under dispute.

Following this, the Bench noted, “The action (of Bank) not only causes undue hardship to the petitioner but also results in irreparable prejudice to his right to carry on his lawful avocation and financial affairs, without in any manner substantially advancing the object of the investigation.”

Directing the bank to mark ‘lien’ only to the extent of the alleged disputed amount of Rs 240, the court said, “Such a course would strike a balance between the requirement of investigation and the petitioner’s fundamental right to operate his bank account and carry on his livelihood.”

Allowing the petition, the court permitted Ahmed to operate his bank account, subject to his maintaining a minimum balance of Rs 500.