4 min readNew DelhiUpdated: Sep 4, 2026 05:43 PM IST
A consumer commission in Kerala recently directed a private bus operator to pay Rs 14,575 to a passenger who was allegedly forced to travel for more than nine hours on a water-soaked seat while travelling from Kerala to Bengaluru.
President Krishnan K and member Beena K G on August 31 held that a passenger who had to travel for hours in a soaked and unhygienic seat amounts to deficiency in service.
“The complaint is partly allowed directing opposite party no 1 (bus operator) refund Rs 1,575 with 9 percent interest from date of payment till realization with a compensation of Rs 10,000 and cost of Rs 3,000 to the complainant within thirty days from the date of receipt of copy of this order,” the order read.
Seat ‘unfit’
The complainant said that he had booked an AC sleeper bus ticket from Kerala to Bengaluru, paying Rs 1,575. It was alleged that when he boarded the bus, he found the allotted sleeper seat completely wet and soaked with water. According to the complaint, the condition of the seat made it unusable and unhygienic. The complainant said he immediately informed the bus staff and requested another seat, but was allegedly told that the bus was full.
With no alternative mode of travel available, he was allegedly forced to continue the journey to Bengaluru, which lasted for more than nine hours. The passenger alleged that travelling for hours on the wet seat in an air-conditioned bus caused him physical discomfort, fatigue and mental distress. He also alleged that the bus staff behaved indifferently and humiliated him in front of other passengers.
Seeking refund and compensation, the complainant moved consumer commission. The private bus operator failed to appear before the commission despite notice hence the matter proceeded ex parte against it.
The commission relied on photographs and videos produced by the complainant showing that the seat was water-soaked and unfit for travel. It observed that a passenger who was constrained to travel in a soaked, unhygienic seat for 9 hours must have undergone severe mental stress.
Story continues below this ad
The commission noted that the complainant had paid Rs 1,575 for the ticket expecting a reasonable standard of service and basic amenities during the journey. However, it found that the bus operator failed to provide even these basic facilities. In view of the deficiency in service, the commission held that the operator was liable to refund the ticket fare along with compensation and litigation costs. It accordingly directed the operator to refund Rs 1,575 and pay Rs 10,000 as compensation, in addition to Rs 3,000 litigation costs.
Takeaway
Passengers are entitled to the basic amenities promised as part of their journey. If a transport operator provides an unusable or unhygienic seat and fails to offer a reasonable alternative, it can amount to deficiency in service, making the operator liable to refund the fare and pay compensation.
For consumer-related grievances, individuals can contact the consumer helpline in their respective states and Union territories (Kerala: 1800-425-1550) or call the National Consumer Helpline at 1915 for assistance.
Don’t miss out on these stories:
Mother’s 12-year legal battle against LIC ends with court ordering staggering Rs 1.26 crore payout
Story continues below this ad
Widow wins Rs 50 lakh after insurer rejects husband’s critical illness claim over ‘fraud’ record
Man sold ‘insurance policy’ instead of FD from wife’s cancer fund, wins Rs 1.5 lakh