Premium

Jharkhand High Court commutes man’s death penalty in rape and murder case to life term, cites lack of reform assessment

Jharkhand High Court News: While citing the Supreme Court judgement, the bench said that the probability of reformation, rehabilitation and social re integration of the appellant, also can't be ruled out.

3 min readNew DelhiUpdated: Jan 8, 2026 04:18 PM IST

Justice Sujit Narayan Prasad Justice Arun Kumar Rai Jharkhand High Court

Jharkhand High Court News: Jharkhand High Court was hearing a plea filed convict and commuted his death sentence to life imprisonment. (Image enhanced using AI)

Jharkhand High Court News: The Jharkhand High Court recently commuted a trial court’s order of death sentence to a man into life imprisonment in the rape and murder case of a five-year-old girl.

A division bench of Justices Sujit Narayan Prasad and Arun Kumar Rai was hearing a review plea of a convict booked under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.

“Even in the backdrop of the fact that accused was involved in three similar nature of cases, and the case related to the gruesome rape and murder of a girl child, the apex court, laying down the law that in absence of any consideration about the probability of reformation, rehabilitation and social reintegration of the appellant into the society, the death sentence awarded upon, could not be maintained, commuted the death sentence of the accused,” the court observed.

Referring to the top court’s Sachin Kumar Singhraha vs. State of MP decision, the high court added that the probability of reformation, rehabilitation, and social reintegration of the appellant cannot be ruled out.

Also Read | Death sentence commuted after 19 years: Why ‘illegal solitary confinement’ saved 2 convicts from gallows

Case

According to the prosecution, the case dates back to 2022, when the man approached the victim.

Later, the child’s body was discovered at a secluded place, and the medical examination confirmed the child had been sexually assaulted and then strangulated.

In 2023, the police submitted the chargesheet, and the trial court took formal cognisance of the offences under Section 302 (punishment for murder) of the IPC and Section 6 (punishment for aggravated penetrative sexual assault) of the POCSO Act.

Story continues below this ad

While taking into consideration the “last seen” testimony and medical experts who detailed the brutal nature of the injuries, the trial court ordered the death penalty for the convict.

Following this, the convict approached the high court against his conviction.

Also Read | HC commutes death sentence of man who beheaded disabled brother over property row

Decision

Drawing on the landmark judgments in Rajendra Pralhadrao Wasnik vs. State of Maharashtra the court held that though the extreme penalty of death was not warranted in the facts of this case, the accused does not deserve any major leniency in the matter of remission of the sentence, awarding the capital punishment of death to the petitioner for the offence under Section 302 of the IPC, is hereby, commuted to the life sentence.

Commuting the death penalty to a life sentence, the court said that the alternative option shall serve the interest of justice.

Story continues below this ad

The court added that the sentence passed against the petitioner for the offence under Section 6 of the POCSO Act shall also run concurrently.

“We also hereby affirm his sentence for the offence under Section 6 of the Act,” the court observed.

“Accordingly, the trial court judgment of conviction stands affirmed, with the modification in the sentence of the convict,” the court ruled.

The bench also ordered the compensation to the parents of the victim under the ‘victim compensation scheme’.

Jagriti Rai

Jagriti Rai works with The Indian Express, where she writes from the vital intersection of law, gender, and society. Working on a dedicated legal desk, she focuses on translating complex legal frameworks into relatable narratives, exploring how the judiciary and legislative shifts empower and shape the consciousness of citizens in their daily lives. Expertise Socio-Legal Specialization: Jagriti brings a critical, human-centric perspective to modern social debates. Her work focuses on how legal developments impact gender rights, marginalized communities, and individual liberties. Diverse Editorial Background: With over 4 years of experience in digital and mainstream media, she has developed a versatile reporting style. Her previous tenures at high-traffic platforms like The Lallantop and Dainik Bhaskar provided her with deep insights into the information needs of a diverse Indian audience. Academic Foundations: Post-Graduate in Journalism from the Indian Institute of Mass Communication (IIMC), India’s premier media training institute. Master of Arts in Ancient History from Banaras Hindu University (BHU), providing her with the historical and cultural context necessary to analyze long-standing social structures and legal evolutions. ... Read More