‘Heinous but not premeditated’: Allahabad High Court commutes man’s death penalty to life term in minor’s rape case
Allahabad High Court ruling, minor rape murder case: The Allahabad High Court was hearing the confirmation proceedings and the appeal of a death row convict in a rape and murder case of his minor cousin when it communted his punishment to life term.
3 min readNew DelhiUpdated: Nov 20, 2025 10:10 AM IST
Allahabad High Court ruling: The convict was stated to be 27 years of age, being a father of a minor child himself at the time of incident. (File Photo)
Allahabad High Court ruling: The Allahabad High Court has upheld the conviction of a man in a rape and murder case involving a minor but commuted his death penalty to life term for want of criminal history and observing there was no evidence to show he had acted with a “premeditated mind”.
A division bench of Justices Rajnish Kumar and Rajeev Singh on November 18 observed though it was a “henious crime of rape” in which a child eventually succumbed to the injuries, the act was “not committed with a pre-meditated mind”.
The bench was acting on the confirmation proceedings of the death penalty filed by the state and the appeal of the convict challenging the trial court’s judgment handing out the capital punishment to him.
Therefore, the court said the “death penalty was liable to be commuted to life imprisonment till the natural life of convict without remission”.
The bench observed neither there was a criminal history of the man nor any evidence was brought on record to prove that the offence was committed with a pre-meditated mind.
“There is no criminal history of the convict and there is no evidence that offence was committed with pre-meditated mind, this Court is of the view that the death penalty is liable to be commuted to life imprisonment till the natural life of convict/appellant without remission,” the court said.
While commuting the trial court’s capital punishment to life imprisonment, the court said, “In a case based on circumstantial evidence, in which, offence is under Section 376 (rape) and Section 302 (murder) of IPC, though the death penalty can be awarded in the ‘rarest of rare’. But normally imprisonment for life without any remission may be awarded, unless death sentence is inevitable.”
Story continues below this ad
The convict was stated to be 27 years of age, being a father of a minor himself at the time of incident.
The bench highlighted that though the trial court considered the circumstances in detail, it was done “without any report of the evaluation from the probation officer, jail administration and psychologist”.
Advocate Rajesh Kumar Dwivedi, representing the convict, argued that his client was framed in this case on account of enmity, stressing that he was not even present at the relevant place and time. He further argued that the FIR did not match with the series of the alleged events and it was lodged with an “inordinate delay”.
Government Advocate Dr V K Singh and additional government advocate Raj Deep Singh, representing the state, said that the offence was “very brutal” and the trial court had “rightly convicted and awarded the death sentence”.
Story continues below this ad
Background:
According to the FIR, the incident dates back to February 16, 2021, when the girl went missing and was later found dead. Investigation revealed that the toddler was in the company of the convict before the incident.
He was convicted and sentenced to death by the trial court for the offences under Section 376 (rape), 364 (kidnapping or abducting in order to murder) and 302 (murder) of the IPC and Section 6 (aggravated penetrative sexual assault) of the Protection of Chidlren from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.
Jagriti Rai works with The Indian Express, where she writes from the vital intersection of law, gender, and society. Working on a dedicated legal desk, she focuses on translating complex legal frameworks into relatable narratives, exploring how the judiciary and legislative shifts empower and shape the consciousness of citizens in their daily lives.
Expertise
Socio-Legal Specialization: Jagriti brings a critical, human-centric perspective to modern social debates. Her work focuses on how legal developments impact gender rights, marginalized communities, and individual liberties.
Diverse Editorial Background: With over 4 years of experience in digital and mainstream media, she has developed a versatile reporting style. Her previous tenures at high-traffic platforms like The Lallantop and Dainik Bhaskar provided her with deep insights into the information needs of a diverse Indian audience.
Academic Foundations:
Post-Graduate in Journalism from the Indian Institute of Mass Communication (IIMC), India’s premier media training institute.
Master of Arts in Ancient History from Banaras Hindu University (BHU), providing her with the historical and cultural context necessary to analyze long-standing social structures and legal evolutions. ... Read More