Premium

‘Sacrilegious affront’: HC denies bail to advocate accused of demanding Rs 30 lakh bribe to ‘influence’ Punjab judicial officer

The detailed order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court described the allegations against the advocate as exceptionally grave, and said they strike at the foundation of the justice delivery system.

HCThe accused advocate, around 70 years old and practising at the Punjab and Haryana High Court, has been in custody since August 14, 2025. (Express Photo)

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has dismissed the regular bail plea of advocate Jatin Salwan who has been accused of demanding Rs 30 lakh to influence a judicial officer in a divorce case pending at Bathinda courts.

Justice Sumeet Goel, in a detailed order, described the allegations as exceptionally grave, stating that they strike at the foundation of the justice delivery system and erode public confidence. Salwan, around 70 years old and practising at the high court, has been in custody since August 14, 2025, following an operation by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).

The case stems from a First Information Report (FIR) registered on August 14, 2025, under Section 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and Section 7A of the Prevention of Corruption Act. Complainant Harsimranjit Singh alleged that Salwan demanded the bribe for a favourable order in his cousin Sandeep Kaur’s divorce matter, claiming personal influence over the Bathinda judge.

After verification, including recorded conversations, the CBI laid a trap. Co-accused Satnam Singh allegedly accepted Rs 4 lakh as part payment, which was later recovered. Salwan was subsequently arrested from his residence.

Arguments raised by the petitioner

Contentions raised by Salwan’s counsels R S Cheema and S S Narula:

  • False and motivated implication
  • Demand was misconstrued professional fee for litigation after case transfer from Sangrur
  • Section 7A ingredients not met as Salwan is not a public servant and the judicial officer lacked jurisdiction
  • Material inconsistencies in the complaint and FIR
  • No independent corroboration, only conjectures
  • Advanced age, serious cardiac ailments and anxiety disorders
  • Over five months in custody, with trial likely to take time and no need for further interrogation

Reasons for denial of bail by Justice Sumeet Goel

The judge outlined the following key reasons in points:

  • Allegations are serious, involving an attempt to influence judicial outcome, with wider impact on public trust beyond mere monetary gain
  • Prima facie material from verified complaint, recorded conversations, trap proceedings and recovery cannot be ignored at this stage
  • Section 7A applies as it covers any person obtaining an undue advantage to influence a public servant by corrupt means
  • Age and professional standing, though relevant, cannot outweigh the gravity of allegations
  • Medical assessment by CBI showed no ailment warranting bail on health grounds
  • Reasonable apprehension of influencing witnesses, given Salwan’s position as an experienced advocate
  • Salwan faces another pending FIR under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act and fake currency provisions.
  • Completion of investigation and over five months’ custody are relevant but do not operate as an absolute entitlement to bail in view of offence’s socio-legal implications
  • Such acts by an advocate amount to “sacrilegious affront to judiciary” as an institution

The court dismissed the petition, but granted liberty to Salwan to seek bail afresh before the special CBI court after examination of complainant Harsimranjit Singh and victim Sandeep Kaur. Observations in the order will not affect trial merits. A lower court had earlier rejected his bail on September 1, 2025.

Manraj Grewal Sharma is a senior journalist and the Resident Editor of The Indian Express in Chandigarh, where she leads the newspaper’s coverage of north India’s most politically and institutionally significant regions. From Punjab and Haryana to Himachal Pradesh and the Union Territory of Chandigarh, she oversees reporting at the intersection of governance, law, politics and society. She also reports on the diaspora, especially in Canada and the US. With a career spanning journalism across several countries, academia and international development, Manraj brings a rare depth of perspective to regional reporting. She is widely regarded as a leading chronicler of Punjab’s contemporary history and socio-political evolution, particularly its long shadow of militancy, federal tensions and identity politics. Her book, Dreams after Darkness, remains a definitive account of the militancy years and their enduring aftermath. Professional Background & Expertise A gold medalist in mass communication and a post-graduate in English literature, Manraj has a multifaceted career spanning journalism, academia, and international development. She was also awarded a fellowship by National Foundation of India and did several in-depth pieces on Manipur. Internationally, she has reported from Israel, US, UK, Myanmar, and Mauritius Her key focus areas include: Regional Politics, History, Agriculture, Diaspora, and Security. Of late, she has started focusing on Legal & Judicial Affairs: Much of her recent work involves reporting on high-stakes cases in the Punjab and Haryana High Court, ranging from environmental policy to civil rights. International Consulting: She previously served as a consulting editor for the Asia Pacific Adaptation Network and a publishing consultant for the Asian Development Bank (ADB) in Manila. Academia: For five years, she was the managing editor of Gender, Technology and Development, a peer-reviewed international journal at the Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok. Recent Notable Articles (Late 2025) Her recent reportage focuses heavily on judicial interventions and regional governance: 1. Environment & Governance "‘NGT can’t test legality of policy’: HC hears challenge to Punjab’s ‘Green Habitat’ plan" (Dec 22, 2025): Covering a critical legal battle over whether the National Green Tribunal has the authority to strike down a state policy regularizing farmhouses on delisted forest land. "High court pulls up Punjab poll panel over audio clip probe" (Dec 10, 2025): Reporting on judicial concerns regarding the transparency and fairness of local body elections. 2. Legal Rights & Social Welfare "HC issues notice to Punjab, Haryana over delay in building old age homes" (Dec 22, 2025): Reporting on a contempt petition against top officials for failing to establish government-run homes for the elderly as promised in 2019. "Victims can appeal acquittals in sessions court without seeking special leave" (Dec 19, 2025): Highlighting a significant procedural shift in criminal law following a Supreme Court ruling. "HC upholds benefits for Punjab FCI officer acquitted in 20-year-old bribery case" (Dec 19, 2025): A report on the concept of "honourable acquittal" and its impact on employee benefits. 3. Human Rights & Identity "As Punjab denies parole to MP Amritpal Singh, HC asks it to submit ‘foundational material’" (Dec 1, 2025): Covering the legal proceedings regarding the radical preacher and sitting MP's request to attend Parliament. "Protecting life paramount: HC backs Muslim woman in live-in after verbal divorce" (Nov 6, 2025): Analyzing judicial protections for personal liberty in the context of traditional practices. Signature Beats Manraj is recognized for her ability to decode complex judicial rulings and relate them to the everyday lives of citizens. Whether it is a 30-year-old land battle in Fazilka or the political implications of Kangana Ranaut’s candidacy in Mandi, her writing provides deep historical and regional context. Contact @grewal_sharma on X manrajgrewalsharma on Instagram ... Read More

 

Advertisement
Loading Recommendations...
Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments