Tour operator ‘absconds’ before Gujarat-Rajasthan trip, Kerala family wins Rs 95,000

The man joined the tour programme to visit Gujarat and Rajasthan, but the tour operator allegedly stopped responding after receiving advance amount from the complainant.

tour operator kerala consumer court Rs 95000 Rajasthan Gujarat tripThe commission found that after receiving the advance amount of Rs 80,000 from the complainant, the tour operator absconded and did not arrange the trip. (AI-generated image)

A Kerala consumer commission has directed a holiday tour operator to pay Rs 95,000 after he allegedly failed to arrange a Gujarat-Rajasthan family tour despite taking the advance payment. The complainant, a government employee, who had planned the trip with his wife and two children, paid Rs 80,000 towards the Rs 1.19 lakh package, but alleged that the operator stopped responding after receiving the money.

President Ravi Susha, along with members Moly Kutty Mathew and Sajeesh K P of the Kannur District Consumer Commission, was hearing the complaint filed by the man, who had planned the tour for May but said the trip never materialised and he did not receive a refund.

“There is deficiency of service and unfair trade practice on the part of the opposite party (tour operator). The opposite party is directly bound to redress the grievances caused to the complainant. Therefore we hold that the OP is liable to refund Rs. 80,000 with 9 per cent interest per annum from the date of payment till realisation,” the August 31 order read. 

No tour, no refund

The man claimed that he and his wife work in government service. The couple intended to arrange a tour programme on May 6 to Gujarat and Rajasthan for them and their children. After coming across the advertisement of the tour company and the assurance of the operator, the man allegedly joined the tour programme.

The total amount for the tour programme was Rs 1.19 lakh, and the man allegedly paid Rs 80,000 in February for the trip for the four family members and also shared Aadhaar card copies of his family with the operator.

He then requested the tour operator for confirmation of the flight tickets and other services so that he could apply for leave from his department. But, according to the man, after receiving Rs 80,000 from him, the tour operator stopped responding despite several attempts to contact him.

He added that the tour operator saw his message in April and responded that he was on a train and would call him back. Thereafter, the operator allegedly neither contacted the complainant nor refunded the amount.

Story continues below this ad

Aggrieved, he moved the commission, alleging deficiency of service and unfair trade practice and saying that the conduct of the tour operator caused him mental agony, hardship and financial loss.

‘Tour operator absconded’

The commission found that after receiving the advance amount of Rs 80,000 from the complainant, the tour operator had absconded and did not arrange the tour programme for the complainant and his family.

It was also found that the man had several times attempted to contact him, but he also evaded the phone calls. “So the opposite party did not comply with the terms and conditions of the tour package. The act of the opposite party caused much mental agony and financial loss to the complainant and his family members,” it added.

It was noted that the operator, after receiving the notice, did not appear before the commission and did not file his written version.

Story continues below this ad

Accordingly, the commission directed the tour operator to refund Rs 80,000 to the man and also pay Rs 10,000 as compensation for mental agony and Rs 5,000 as litigation cost within 30 days.

Takeaway

This ruling highlights that failure to provide a promised tour service after receiving payment can amount to deficiency in service and unfair trade practice, with the consumer commission ordering a refund and compensation.

For consumer-related grievances, individuals may contact the consumer helpline in their respective states and union territories (Kerala: 1800-425-1550) or call the National Consumer Helpline at 1915 for assistance.

Don’t miss out on these stories:

Airline to pay Bihar man Rs 85,000 after flight delay forces family to buy fresh tickets

Story continues below this ad

Rs 1,500 Anarkali dress bought on Instagram never came: Kerala woman wins Rs 16,000

Ordered diapers for 1.5-year-old daughter, ‘never’ delivered: Father wins Rs 22,500

Richa Sahay is a Legal Correspondent for The Indian Express (Digital), where she focuses on simplifying the complexities of the Indian judicial system. A law postgraduate, she leverages her advanced legal education to bridge the gap between technical court rulings and public understanding, ensuring that readers stay informed about the rapidly evolving legal landscape. Expertise Advanced Legal Education: As a law postgraduate, Richa possesses the academic depth required to interpret intricate statutes and constitutional nuances. Her background allows her to provide more than just summaries; she offers context-driven analysis of how legal changes impact the average citizen. Specialized Beat: She operates at the intersection of law and public policy, focusing on: Judicial Updates: Providing timely reports on orders from the Supreme Court of India and various High Courts. Legal Simplification: Translating dense "legalese" into accessible, engaging narratives without sacrificing factual accuracy. Legislative Changes: Monitoring new bills, amendments, and regulatory shifts that shape Indian society. ... Read More

 

Advertisement
Loading Recommendations...
Advertisement
Advertisement
Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments